“You Can’t Handle the Truth” was a line in the movie, “A Few Good Men” – Please watch and listen before reading the rest of this short but very important article!
This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid – 19 fatalities!
Table 1 has counts of death involving COVID-19 and select causes of death by sex and age group for the United States.
The real and truthful numbers (unlike those reported by the fake news) reflect that only 6% of all 164,280 deaths recorded actually died from Covid-19!
Table 2 presents death counts of COVID-19 and other select causes of death by the place of death.
What this means is the real number of fatalities for COVID-19 in the USA amount to 9,857 deaths out of the erroneous 164,280 deaths!
Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned.
The other 94% fatalities had 2-3 other serious primary illnesses (like diagnosed cancer or heart disease) with the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age. (Over 85 years of age as shown in Table 1 on the red line in the graph)
Please check out the CDC link below for verifying the truth about COVID-19 as seen from their own produced Tables 1, 2 and 3!
This whole COVID-19 Worldwide Pandemic has truly been a HUGE fraud perpetuated upon the entire human race! COVID-19 is NOT a Pandemic but a Plannedemic! orchestrated by some very ‘Bad Actors’ who have a ‘GOD COMPLEX’ and who only care about themselves!
Their slogan should be ‘NO LIVES MATTER’ except theirs!
Now my question to you is this – Can YOU Handle the Truth and then open your mouth and save yourself and your loved ones from the real agenda behind COVID-19 – the mass execution of over 7 billion people by chemical, biological and electromagnetic poisoning?
UPDATE: THIS SHOW HAS BEEN UPLOADED TO BITCHUTE AND IS AVAILABLE TO VIEW BELOW!!.
August 26, 2020 @ 7 PM PT – A roundtable discussion with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Robert O. Young regarding COVID, Vaccines and Viruses. We will cover the latest announcement by President Trump with regard to the new Plasma Treatment, as well as the latest CDC announcement saying asymptomatic people do not need to be tested! (articles and bio(s) linked below).
“Dear Kerry, Thank you for the opportunity to share the New Biology. I didn’t mention were people may buy our nutritional products and I know that there lots of interest around the world. Please post this information below my video. All our bestsellers including those I have mentioned in my interview can be found at www.phmiracleproducts.com For International orders we suggest to email product names, quantity, Person’s name, address, phone number and email to email@example.com and we will help everyone who contacts us. If someone would like to have a consultation with me they can book it on my personal website here www.drrobertyoung.com/services-page.
Thank you again, Best regards,
Dr. Robert Young”
ABOUT BIOWEAPONS: …”Biolabs are acid labs. There are NO bioweapons. Germs are born in us and from us. Viruses are acidic waste from cellular breakdown or fermentation. Antibiotics have been the result. Which are nothing more or less than the acidic waste of fermentation. In other words, you take a yeast-like penicillium and ferment sugar and you end up with the so-called antibiotic which is the acid waste from fermentation. It is morbid thinking to believe you can cure disease with disease.”
Short bio: “Dr. Young may be on the threshold of a new biology, whose principle—if proven—could revolutionize the biology and medicine worlds.” Neil Solomon, M.D., Ph.D. Former Head of Research for John Hopkins University.
Over the past two and a half decades, Robert O. Young has been widely recognized as one of the top research scientists in the world. Throughout his career, his research has been focused at the cellular level. Having a specialty in cellular nutrition, Dr. Young has devoted his life to researching the true causes of “disease,” subsequently developing “The New Biology™” to help people balance their life.
NOTE: Considering Dr. Young’s premise, within the current world situation and how we got here. The ‘weaponization of acidic rain (made from our cellular acidic waste in bioweapns labs) then distributed in clouds and ultimately acidic rain (or mist) that falls upon us you have the delivery mechanism for creating a worldwide pandemic. Add 5G being activated in various key cities and you have the heavy concentrations of acid rain coupled with 5G and that results in an irradiated soup all around us and the effect is a high incidence of disease.
Google definition of “irradiation” – Irradiation is the process by which an object is exposed to radiation. … The term irradiation usually excludes the exposure to non-ionizing radiation, such as infrared, visible light, microwaves from cellular phones or electromagnetic waves emitted by radio and TV receivers and power supplies.” The words “usually excludes” are suspect as one can easily see on the contrary in our world becoming irradiated most likely includes radiation, electromagnetic waves emitted by cell phones and TVs as well as 4G and now 5G in some places and significant radiation from leaking nuclear power plants (such as Fukushima).
#1 on Amazon Charts, New York Times Bestseller, USA Today Bestseller—Over 100,000 Copies in Print!
“Kent Heckenlively and Judy Mikovits are the new dynamic duo fighting corruption in science.” —Ben Garrison, America’s #1 political satirist
Dr. Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin, a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys’ club of science with her groundbreaking discoveries. And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men, she uncovered decades-old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried.
From her doctoral thesis, which changed the treatment of HIV-AIDS, saving the lives of millions, including basketball great Magic Johnson, to her spectacular discovery of a new family of human retroviruses, and her latest research which points to a new golden age of health, Dr. Mikovits has always been on the leading edge of science.
With the brilliant wit one might expect if Erin Brockovich had a doctorate in molecular biology, Dr. Mikovits has seen the best and worst of science. When she was part of the research community that turned HIV-AIDS from a fatal disease into a manageable one, she saw science at its best. But when her investigations questioned whether the use of animal tissue in medical research were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases, such as autism and chronic fatigue syndrome, she saw science at its worst. If her suspicions are correct, we are looking at a complete realignment of scientific practices, including how we study and treat human disease.
Recounting her nearly four decades in science, including her collaboration of more than thirty-five years with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founders of the field of human retrovirology, this is a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity.”–from book on Amazon linked below.…
”Analysis by multiple independent groups have estimated that Part 1 has received “over one billion views,” making it the most viewed and banned documentary of all time.
If you were brave enough to share the controversial information, thank you! Because of you, the movie has been subtitled in numerous languages and is currently viral in other countries. As a result, a coalition of 27,000 plus scientists and doctors have gathered in support of a movement to reform our corrupt global healthcare system.
We are currently in production on Plandemic Part 2 and over the past few weeks we’ve interviewed top legal and medical experts that have validated nearly every claim made by Dr Judy Mikovits in Part 1. Part 2 will set the record straight and further expose the blatant lies Big Pharma and Big Media are using to silence a brave woman who simply refuses to bow down to those who profit from keeping us unhealthy and addicted.”–Kent Heckenlively, co-author
The pores or opening sizes in cloth and surgical masks range from 80 to 500 microns, which is much larger than particular matter (PM) in the nano micro range such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen cyanide(HCN), titanium dioxide (TiO2), aluminum dioxide, carbon dioxide (CO2)l, bacteria, or even bacterphages or exosomes sometimes referred to the virus. Therefore, any of the above cloth or surgical masks are useless and provide no possible protection against PM less than 80 microns and nothing in the nano micron range.(See Figure 1)
Figure 1 – Biologicals and Chemicals Based Upon Size
The filtering efficiency of all six of the above selected masks may potentially filter out PM larger than 80 microns such as pollen, dust or hair. Based upon the sizes of bacteria, yeast, molds, endotoxins, bateriophages, exosomes (so-called viruses), carbon monoxide emissions and factory emissions of nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, aluminum dioxide, including electrical and magnetic fields (EMF), cloth and surgical masks provide absolutely NO filtering efficiency of PM smaller than 80 microns due to their larger open pores present in all cloth and surgical masks. (See Figure 2 – A through F are cloth masks and G through I are surgical masks)
Figure 2 – Using Bright Field Microscopy at 100x You Can See the Open Pores Ranging From 9 to over 500 microns. The Scale Bar in Micrograph A is 500 Microns
The representative bright fieldmicroscopy images of different CMs and SMs are shown in Figure 2. Out of 20 CMs (CM1-CM20) imaged, for brevity, images of CM1, CM3, CM7, CM9, CM12, CM18 are shown in A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively. The bright patches in the bright field microscopy images are the pores present in the masks. All CMs viewed contained two ply (layers) and the surface characteristics of both layers was very similar.
For comparison, you can view the surface of seven different brands of paper/SMs masks available on the market. The SM masks examined contained two or three layers (two or three ply). The surface morphology of the inner, middle, and outer layers of a three ply SM is shown in Figure 2 G, H and I. These micrographs showed a mean range of pores for the CM and the SM from 81 to 461 microns.
Based upon viewing and measuring the pore sizes of the CM and the SM using bright field microscopy at 100x magnification both types of masks were found to be incapable of filtering PM smaller than 81 microns. Because of the size ranges of PM9[see Figure 4], such as tobacco smoke, bacteria, yeast, mold, endotoxins, mycotoxins, exotoxins, exosomes, bacteriophages, air pollutants of nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, aluminum dioxide, EMF, etc. the wearing of a cloth or surgical mask provides no protection from disease causing chemical, biological, electrical or magnetic pollution.[See Figure 3]
Figure 4 – Showing Particulate Matter (PM) Measuring From 0.001 Nano Microns to 10,000 Microns
1) What type of mask will I need to wear in order to protect myself from small micro particles and even smaller nana particles?
2. Will social distancing provide protection against small micro and even smaller nano particulate matter?
The answer is a big NO because micro and nano particles are all around ux especially in the larger cities where you find elevated PM from increased air pollution and electrical and magnetic poLlution
Belkin (1997) Belkin NL. The evolution of the surgical mask: filtering efficiency versus effectiveness. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 1997;18(1):49–57. doi: 10.1086/647501. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cherrie et al. (2018) Cherrie JW, Apsley A, Cowie H, Steinle S, Mueller W, Lin C, Horwell CJ, Sleeuwenhoek A, Loh M. Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018;75(6):446–452. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104765. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Chughtai, Seale & MacIntyre (2013) Chughtai AA, Seale H, MacIntyre CR. Use of cloth masks in the practice of infection control—evidence and policy gaps. International Journal of Infection Control. 2013;9(3):1–12. doi: 10.3396/ijic.v9i3.020.13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Colbeck, Nasir & Ali (2010) Colbeck I, Nasir ZA, Ali Z. The state of indoor air quality in Pakistan—a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2010;17(6):1187–1196. doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0293-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gurung & Bell (2012) Gurung A, Bell ML. Exposure to airborne particulate matter in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 2012;22(3):235–242. doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.14. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kim, Kabir & Kabir (2015) Kim K-H, Kabir E, Kabir S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environment International. 2015;74:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
MacIntyre & Chughtai (2015) MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. Facemasks for the prevention of infection in healthcare and community settings. BMJ. 2015;350:h694. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h694. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
MacIntyre et al. (2015) MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, Hien NT, Nga PT, Chughtai AA, Rahman B, Dwyer DE, Wang Q. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maleki et al. (2016) Maleki H, Sorooshian A, Goudarzi G, Nikfal A, Baneshi MM. Temporal profile of PM 10 and associated health effects in one of the most polluted cities of the world (Ahvaz, Iran) between 2009 and 2014. Aeolian Research. 2016;22:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.08.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maxted (2011) Maxted B. Dust masks for Indian quarry workers: a comparative analysis of the filtering efficiency of fabrics. Journal of Humanitarian Engineering. 2011;1:15–20. [Google Scholar]
Mirowsky et al. (2013) Mirowsky J, Hickey C, Horton L, Blaustein M, Galdanes K, Peltier RE, Chillrud S, Chen LC, Ross J, Nadas A, Lippmann M, Gordon T. The effect of particle size, location and season on the toxicity of urban and rural particulate matter. Inhalation Toxicology. 2013;25(13):747–757. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2013.846443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mueller et al. (2018) Mueller W, Horwell CJ, Apsley A, Steinle S, McPherson S, Cherrie JW, Galea KS. The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part I: filtration efficiency tests. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2018;221(6):967–976. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.03.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Neupane (2016) Neupane BB. Stimulated emission depletion microscopy resolves nanoparticle assembly on a porous membrane surface. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology. 2016;17:17–22. [Google Scholar]
Rauniyaar, Aryal & Neupane (2019) Rauniyaar J, Aryal GM, Neupane BB. Morphological study on particulate matter of Kathmandu valley. Bibechana. 2019;16:41–46. doi: 10.3126/bibechana.v16i0.19190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Reche et al. (2012) Reche C, Moreno T, Amato F, Viana M, Van Drooge BL, Chuang H-C, Bérubé K, Jones T, Alastuey A, Querol X. A multidisciplinary approach to characterise exposure risk and toxicological effects of PM10 and PM2.5 samples in urban environments. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2012;78:327–335. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.11.043. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rengasamy, Eimer & Shaffer (2010) Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple respiratory protection—evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20–1000 nm size particles. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2010;54:789–798. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq044. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ricardo & Phelan (2008) Ricardo R, Phelan K. Counting and determining the viability of cultured cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2008;16:752. doi: 10.3791/752. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Shakya et al. (2017) Shakya KM, Noyes A, Kallin R, Peltier RE. Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 2017;27(3):352–357. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.42. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sharma et al. (2014) Sharma SK, Mandal TK, Saxena M, Sharma A, Datta A, Saud T. Variation of OC, EC, WSIC and trace metals of PM10 in Delhi, India. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2014;113:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2014.02.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Singh et al. (2010) Singh MP, Singh VK, Patel DK, Tandon PK, Gaur JS, Behari JR, Yadav S. Face mask application as a tool to diminish the particulate matter mediated heavy metal exposure among citizens of Lucknow, India. Science of the Total Environment. 2010;408(23):5723–5728. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.041. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stender et al. (2013) Stender AS, Marchuk K, Liu C, Sander S, Meyer MW, Smith EA, Neupane B, Wang G, Li J, Cheng J-X. Single cell optical imaging and spectroscopy. Chemical Reviews. 2013;113:2469–2527. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Van Der Sande, Teunis & Sabel (2008) Van Der Sande M, Teunis P, Sabel R. Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population. PLOS ONE. 2008;3(7):e2618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002618. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wang et al. (2008) Wang H, Zhuang Y, Wang Y, Sun Y, Yuan H, Zhuang G, Hao Z. Long-term monitoring and source apportionment of PM2.5/PM10 in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2008;20(11):1323–1327. doi: 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62228-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]