High Blood Pressure Readings Not What They Seem

Systolic blood pressure, the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of the left ventricle of the heart, is the most important factor in predicting mortality risk for heart failure patients. Systolic blood pressure is typically the first number in a blood pressure reading; for example, 120 when the blood pressure is reported as 120/80.

Heart failure patients with high systolic blood pressures had lower death rates; those with low systolic pressures may have a more advanced disease and a poorer prognosis. Mortality rates were more than four times higher for those with systolic pressures of less than 120, in comparison to those who had pressure over 161.When the heart is healthy it will work harder to push the same volumn of blood through the 66,000 miles of blood vessels when the blood is over-acidic and sticky – this causes the systolic rate to go up. To lower the blood pressure with acidic drugs can lead to the very thing you are trying to prevent – a heart attack.

Blood pressure naturally lowers when you alkalize the blood with diet and especially exercise. This will break up the blood from hypercoagualtion. Exercise and diet are the two and only drugs one should be taking.

If your blood pressure is normal (120/80) or low and you are not eating an alkaline diet nor excercising your risk factor for heart failure significantly increases.

The misconception that low blood pressure is healthy is a medical illusion and is now explained in this recent study published by JAMA.These conclusions were gleaned from research on more than 48,000 heart failure patients seen at 259 U.S. hospitals between March 2003 and December 2004.

To learn more about the pH Miracle for Heart Disease go to: www.phmiracleliving.com or purchase our book, The pH Miracle or the pH Miracle for Weight Loss. You will find the seven steps to your ideal healthy heart and blood pressure in Chapter 11 of the pH Miracle for Weight Loss or should I say the pH Miracle for Whatever!

Notes:Journal of the American Medical Association November 8, 2006; 296(18): 2217-2226EurekAlert November 7, 2006

ph Miracle Center
16390 Dia Del Sol
Valley Center, California
92082
US

Mainstream Reseachers Question the HIV?AIDS Theory

Just in time for World AIDS Day: Three new studies and a journal article all authored by mainstream researchers that question popular ideas and conventional thinking about HIV and AIDS.
===
The Failure of Viral Load TestsJAMA Study Shakes AIDS Science, Angers HIV Advocates A nationwide team of orthodox AIDS researchers led by doctors Benigno Rodriguez and Michael Lederman of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland are disputing the value of viral load testsa standard used since 1996 to assess health, predict progression to disease, and grant approval to new AIDS drugsafter their study of 2,800 HIV positives concluded viral load measures failed in more than 90% of cases to predict or explain immune status.

Published in the September 27, 2006 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), the findings by Rodriguez et al shake the foundation of the past decade of AIDS science to its core, inciting skepticism and anger among many HIV adherents.
Belief in viral load spread quickly following the 1996 publication of a paper in the journal Science authored by Dr John Mellors and colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh. Mellor et al claimed that numbers produced by the viral load test could accurately predict progression to disease in HIV positives. Soon, use of this new technology extended far beyond conclusions drawn by the study and its approval by the FDA as a prognostic tool.

Claiming viral load numbers corresponded to actual amounts of infectious virus, scientists used the test as a glib response to unanswered questions about how HIV could cause AIDS (Its the virus, stupid!). Pharmaceutical companies jumped on the bandwagon, using changes in viral load numbers in place of actual health or survival benefits to gain FDA approval of highly toxic protease inhibitors, a primary ingredient of todays HAART. Treatment advocates began using viral load to encourage healthy HIV positives with unhealthy numbers to hit early and hard with the newly approved drugs, while AIDS doctors throughout the world started using viral load for everything from diagnosing illness to confirming HIV infection.

The new uses for viral load emerged and gained popular acceptance despite the fact that, according to manufacturers literature, the viral load test is not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or as a diagnostic to confirm the presence of HIV infection.

In a September 29th news article regarding the Rodriguez study, Mellors announced he doesn’t agree with the paper at all, insisting that viral load is the most powerful predictor of time to AIDS and death.” Some AIDS rethinkers note that in defending his opinion, Mellors describes viral load as powerful, an adjective frequently found in the headlines of AIDS drug ads–drugs approved for use based on their ability to affect viral load numbers rather than to produce clinical health benefits or increase survival.

While Mellors and others protest or down play the significance of the JAMA article, Rodriguez’s group stands by its conclusion that viral load is only able to predict progression to disease in 4% to 6% of HIV-positives studied, challenging much of the basis for current AIDS science and treatment policy.

For further information see: Cohen J. Study says HIV blood levels don’t predict immune decline. Science 313(5795):1868, 2006; Rodriquez B, Sethi AK, Cheruvu VK, et al. Predictive value of plasma HIV RNA level on rate of CD4 T-cell decline in untreated HIV infection. JAMA 296(12):1498-506, 2006

===

New Study Questions Reliability of T Cell Counts Finds HIV Negatives with AIDS Defining Numbers Following the news that viral load is not an accurate method of assessing or predicting immune status comes word from the Journal of Infectious Diseases that T cell counts may be less reliable measures of immune competence than previously believed.

A study in Africa conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed that HIV negative populations can have T cell counts below 350, a number that would, according to WHO guidelines, qualify for an AIDS diagnosis in HIV positive populations. Another surprising conclusion from the same WHOstudy: HIV positives that started AIDS drug treatment with low T cell counts had the same survival outcomes as HIV positives that began treatment with high T cell counts.

Check out the conundrums in this November 11 2006 article from New Scientist found online at http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10511-are-we-prescribing-hiv-drugs-properly.html

Are We Prescribing HIV Drugs Properly?

In cash-starved regions of the world, deciding who should get anti-retroviral drugs for HIV is a tough call. Now it seems that one of the main tools for making that decision may be less reliable than it appeared.
World Health Organization guidelines recommend starting anti-retroviral drugs when someone’s CD4 cell count has fallen below 350 cells per microlitre, an indicator of HIV infection, or for people with symptoms of AIDS whose CD4 count has dropped to below 200.
Brian Williams of the WHO and his colleagues studied HIV-positive and HIV-negative populations in eight African countries including Ethiopia, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. They found that between 3 and 5 per cent of HIV-negative people had CD4 counts below 350.

What’s more, when people with low pre-infection cell counts did contract HIV, and received anti-retrovirals, they survived for about nine years – the same as people with high counts (Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol 194, p 1450).

The new findings call into question just how much we understand about CD4 cells and their interaction with HIV, says Williams. “Generally, if you have high CD4 counts you can be considered to be doing pretty well and if you have very low counts, you’re in trouble,” says Williams.
But CD4 counts can vary a lot naturally so if you follow the WHO guidelines to the letter, then some people started on anti-retrovirals would not even be infected with HIV, he concludes.

===

Lancet Study Challenges Claims about HAART Treatment Does Not = Life The surprising conclusion from a recent study published in the medical journal, The Lancet: After starting treatment with HARRT, viral response improved but such improvement has not translated into a decrease in mortality.

The multi-center study reported in The Lancet article tracked the effects of HAART on some 22,000 previously treatment naove HIV positives between 1995 and 2003 at 12 locations in Europe and the USA. Instead of finding data that provide a ringing endorsement of anti-HIV drug therapy, the studys results refute popular claims that the newer anti-HIV meds extend life or improve health.

Commenting on the article, Felix de Fries of Study Group AIDS-Therapy in Zurich, Switzerland had this to say: The Lancet study shows that after a short period of time, HAART treatment led to increases in precisely those opportunistic infections that define AIDSfrom fungal infections of the lungs, skin and intestines to various mycobacterial infections. De Fries also notes that while HAART has led to no sustained increases in CD4 counts, no reduction in AIDS-defining illness and no decrease in mortality rates, its use is associated with a list of serious adverse events including cardiovascular disease, lipodystrophy, lactacidosis, liver and kidney failure, osteoporosis, thyroid dysfunction, neuropathy, and non-AIDS cancers among users.

For more information, please refer to The Lancet, issue 368:451-58 and/or The Study Group AIDS-Therapy by telephone or fax at 0041 44 401 34 24 or by email at felix.defries@tele2.ch

===

Journal Article Advocates Radical Approach to AIDS Prevention Questions Popular Ideas about HIV in Africa
Excerpted fromhttp://www.health-e.org.za/news/article.php?uid=20031447

Taking a swipe at those who try to blame sexual behaviour for the rampant HIV epidemic in southern Africa, Professor Eileen Stillwaggon says that they are caught up in “exotic notions” about Africans. Instead, AIDS prevention efforts will be more successful if they focus on “biological and socio-economic factors” that can be addressed relatively easily and cheaply, she argues persuasively in the latest edition of Africa Policy Journal.

“Differences in sexual behaviour cannot explain 50-fold differences in HIV prevalence around the world,” writes the economics professor from Gettysburg College. “Yet global AIDS policy relies almost entirely on behavioural interventions – abstinence or condoms – for HIV prevention. Southern Africa’s very high AIDS rate has been a source of much speculation. President Thabo Mbeki has been the most vocal proponent for poverty to be put on the global AIDS agenda, and has also condemned Western notions of African sexuality in the context of AIDS.

Stillwaggon is no AIDS denialist, but she doesn’t mince words when she condemns those who propose that changing sexual behaviour is the main solution to Africa’s AIDS epidemic. “Policymakers seem to be convinced (without evidence) that Africans are having more sex than Americans. They do not ask why US college campuses, where rates of chlamydia and genital herpes are as high as 30 to 40 percent, do not have high rates of HIV.” She argues compelling for a return to “the fundamental causes” of the raid spread of AIDS in poor countries – biological and socio-economic factors.

As far as biology is concerned, says Stillwaggon, the immune systems of people in southern Africa are weakened by malnutrition and parasitic illnesses. Malnutrition – a deficiency of energy, protein and minerals such as iron, zinc and vitamins – makes a person far more susceptible to infectious and parasitic diseases. These deficiencies make it hard for new cells to be built, including CD4 cells that protect the body from infections.

“A malnourished, parasite-laden population gives rise to a very different epidemic dynamics from that of a healthier population, but models used by the major AIDS organisations do not take this into consideration,” says Stillwater. Instead, she says, they use a “one-size-fits-all” approach based on behaviour change that ignores factors that make poor people especially vulnerable. The easier, cheaper approach would be to address nutritional deficiencies and parasite infections.

Stillwaggon’s approach is a radical departure from the norm, and offers fresh solutions to AIDS prevention where the decades-old mantra of “abstain, be faithful and condomise” has been unable to stop the spread.

===

AIDS and the Ecology of Poverty
More on Stillwaggons ideas from the Oxford University Press web site: http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Economics/Developmental/?view=usa&ci=9780195169270

Why does AIDS policy ignore much of what is known about epidemics and why they spread? HIV/AIDS flourishes where people are dying of myriad other diseases that are almost unknown among affluent populations. In her book “AIDS and the Ecology of Poverty,” Eileen Stillwaggon draws on conventional epidemiology, which recognizes that people who are malnourished, burdened with parasites and infectious diseases, and who lack access to medical care are vulnerable to other diseases, regardless of whether they are transmitted by air, water, food, or sexual contact. HIV/AIDS is no exception.

This book delivers a telling critique of the behavioral explanation of epidemic AIDS and the stereotypes that lie beneath it. It also shows how the methodologies applied in recent epidemiology and health economics are based on a one-risk-fits-all model that ignores the greater vulnerability of poor people and gives rise to policies that are narrow, shortsighted, and dead-end.

Stillwaggon combines the insights of economics and biology to explain the epidemic spread of HIV/AIDS in poor populations in developing and transition countries. Drawing on a wealth of scientific evidence, the author demonstrates that the HIV/AIDS epidemic cannot be stopped in isolation. She offers pragmatic solutions to economic, social, and health problems that beset poor populations and contribute to the spread of HIV/AIDS.

===

New Web Sites

Former State Senator Stephen Davis just launched two new web sites, both designed specifically as starting points for people whove tested HIV positive to help them begin to explore the other side of AIDS.

http://www.HelpForHIV.com offers a gentle introduction to the concept that test results may be wrong and provides supporting scientific literature. The site includes links to 50 podcasts featuring recorded interviews with various dissident experts, along with links to videos, scientific papers and newspaper and magazine articles dealing specifically with HIV tests and AIDS drugs. The site also lists books, links to all AIDS rethinking websites and blogs, and has a questionnaire people can fill out to help build a database for future legal action.

The second new site http://www.livingwithouthivdrugs.com/ archives a growing collection of true-life stories of HIV positives living healthy and happy lives without HIV medications.

Davis plans to promote HelpForHIV.com in the coming weeks and months through blogs and chat rooms, radio interviews, Google and Yahoo ads, and if all goes well, some TV spots. Davis says, My hope is that these new websites can attract a large number of HIV positives and help them learn the truth about the HIV tests and HIV drugs, creating a powerful community of support at the grassroots level.

===

Not So New Web Sites Worth A Second Look

– Theres a whole new links page at the pH Miracle Living web site enabling visitors to find new science and medical information, lots of health resources and more. Check it out at http://www.phmircleliving.com or http://www.articlesofhealth.blogspot.com

– Visit http://aras.ab.ca to find new links to recent articles on topics ranging from the AIDS drug tenofovir to routine HIV testing and several new pieces inspired by Celia Farber’s March 2006 article in Harpers magazine, AIDS and the Corruption of Science.

– Dont miss the new Challenges page at the Rethinking AIDS web site, which features a collection of informative and entertaining exchanges with AIDS and other medical experts on a variety of related subjects.
See http://www.rethinkingaids.com/Challenges/index.html

Not part of our healthy alkaline community? Go to www.phmiracleliving.com

Acidosis is Unacceptable for Human Health

Theoretically, we humans should be better adapted physiologically to the diet our ancestors were exposed to during millions of years of hominid evolution than to the diet we have been eating since the agricultural revolution a mere 10,000 years ago, and since industrialization only 200 years ago.

Among the many health problems resulting from this mismatch between our genetically determined nutritional requirements and our current diet, some might be a consequence in part of the deficiency of potassium alkali salts (K-base), which are amply present in the plant foods that our ancestors ate in abundance, and the exchange of those salts for sodium chloride (NaCl), which has been incorporated copiously into the contemporary diet, which at the same time is meager in K-base-rich plant foods. Deficiency of K-base in the diet increases the net systemic acid load imposed by the diet.

We know that clinically-recognized chronic metabolic acidosis has deleterious effects on the body, including growth retardation in children, decreased muscle and bone mass in adults, and kidney stone formation, and that correction of acidosis can ameliorate those conditions. Is it possible that a lifetime of eating diets that deliver evolutionarily superphysiologic loads of acid to the body contribute to the decrease in bone and muscle mass, and growth hormone secretion, which occur normally with age? That is, are contemporary humans suffering from the consequences of chronic, diet-induced low-grade systemic metabolic acidosis?

Our group has shown that contemporary net acid-producing diets do indeed characteristically produce a low-grade systemic metabolic acidosis in otherwise healthy adult subjects, and that the degree of acidosis increases with age, in relation to the normally occurring age-related decline in renal functional capacity. We also found that neutralization of the diet net acid load with dietary supplements of potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) improved calcium and phosphorus balances, reduced bone resorption rates, improved nitrogen balance, and mitigated the normally occurring age-related decline in growth hormone secretion–all without restricting dietary NaCl.

Moreover, we found that co-administration of an alkalinizing salt of potassium (potassium citrate) with NaCl prevented NaCl from increasing urinary calcium excretion and bone resorption, as occurred with NaCl administration alone.

Earlier studies estimated dietary acid load from the amount of animal protein in the diet, inasmuch as protein metabolism yields sulfuric acid as an end-product. In cross-cultural epidemiologic studies, Abelow found that hip fracture incidence in older women correlated with animal protein intake, and they suggested a causal relation to the acid load from protein. Those studies did not consider the effect of potential sources of base in the diet. We considered that estimating the net acid load of the diet (i. e., acid minus base) would require considering also the intake of plant foods, many of which are rich sources of K-base, or more precisely base precursors, substances like organic anions that the body metabolizes to bicarbonate. In following up the findings of Abelow et al., we found that plant food intake tended to be protective against hip fracture, and that hip fracture incidence among countries correlated inversely with the ratio of plant-to-animal food intake. These findings were confirmed in a more homogeneous population of white elderly women residents of the U.S.

These findings support affirmative answers to the questions we asked above. Can we provide dietary guidelines for controlling dietary net acid loads to minimize or eliminate diet-induced and age-amplified chronic low-grade metabolic acidosis and its pathophysiological sequelae. We discussed the use of algorithms to predict the diet net acid and provide nutritionists and clinicians with relatively simple and reliable methods for determining and controlling the net acid load of the diet. A more difficult question is what level of acidosis is acceptable. We argued that any level of acidosis may be unacceptable from an evolutionarily perspective, and indeed, that a low-grade metabolic alkalosis may be the optimal acid-base state for humans.

Not part of our alkaline community? Sign up now at: www.phmiracleliving.com

Articles of Health by Dr. Robert O. Young at: www.articlesofhealth.blogspot.com

Source: Frassetto L, Morris RC Jr, Sellmeyer DE, Todd K, Sebastian A. Diet, evolution and aging–the pathophysiologic effects of the post-agricultural inversion of the potassium-to-sodium and base-to-chloride ratios in the human diet.Eur J Nutr. 2001 Oct;40(5):200-13.

Alkaline Water Cures 75% of ALL Health Challenges!

You’re Not Sick, You’re Thirsty

“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.”(I Corinthians 3:19)

Is the answer to our current health care crisis as simple as drinking half your bodyweight a day in alkaline water with a teaspoon of pure, colloidal pHlavor sea salt? It sounds too easy doesn’t it? However, the passage from Corinthians makes it clear that what man thinks is best or correct is generally foolishness to God. Think about it for a moment. Trillions of dollars are being made annually worldwide when it comes to health care. Pharmaceutical companies have billions of people literally hooked on drugs that do absolutely nothing to cure their health problems.

Scientists, doctors and researchers are all in search of the magic bullet cure that they think will be found in some synthetic concoction they come up with. Might they all be looking in the wrong places?

Everyone knows that alkaline water is the source of all life on earth. NASA scientists send space probes around the universe in search of water because they know that if they can find water, life on other planets is possible. Why is it that something as simple as consuming more alkaline water is not considered when it comes to treating or preventing dis-ease? Every single cell of our body runs on alkaline water. Cells are the bricks and mortar of our chemical make up. Our respiratory and circulatory systems require alkaline water to function. The simple fact is without adequate hydration we would be dead. Could it be that the manifestation of dis-ease symptoms is really your body’s cry for alkaline water and the 75 to 80 minerals needed in the form of pure, unprocessed colloidal sea salt like pHlavor?

For more information on colloidal sea salt go to: http://www.phmiracleliving.com/phlavor.htm

According to water activist Bob Butts, this water recipe is helping thousands of people get well from their health problems. To learn more about the alkaline water cure go to: http://www.phmiracleliving.com/melody.htm

The recipe for is listed below.

——————————————————————-

The Water Cure Recipe

Drink your entire body weight of alkaline water in ounces, daily. Example: 180 lb = 180 oz. of alkaline water daily. Divide that into 8 or 10 oz. glasses and that’s how many glasses you will need to drink, daily. Use 1 tsp. of pHlavor salt for every 4 to 6 ounces of alkaline water you drink. Use pHlavor salt liberally with food. As long as you drink the alkaline water, you can use the pHlavor salt. Use only 50 to 80 mineral, no additive, unprocessed pHlavor sea salt. Avoid table salt. It only has three minerals in it. While the best sea salts contain all minerals, you should eat a avocado or two a day for potassium and take some magnesium, calcium and zinc to maximize your immune system. Avoid caffeinated or alcoholic drinks. These are diuretics and will dehydrate you. Every 6 oz. of caffeine or alcohol requires an additional 10 to 12 oz. of alkalone water to re-hydrate you.

Monitor your pH checking both urine and saliva with test strips. You can buy your strips at:http://www.phmiracleliving.com/ph_strips.htm. The best internal fluid pH is 7.365. The lower the reading, the more acid your body is and the more difficult it is for it to repair itself because it is then in a degenerative state. You will find that in most cases, the people with cancer and other terrible health challenges are very acidic. Alkaline water and colloidal pHlavor sea salt are the best for neutralizing acid, but there are foods you need to select for proper pH. Read all about pH on www.phmiracleliving.com or buy the book, “The pH Miracle.” You will be amazed at how acid soda, coffee, tea and beer are if you check them with litmus paper. Likewise check the worst and best foods with litmus paper also so you understand how important it is to eat properly.

Exercise must also be done regularly as nothing works without proper exercise. Jogging or rebounding are the best. See exercise link at: http://www.phmiracleliving.com/rebounder.htm

About the Free Alklaine Water Cure

If you don’t get your car’s ball joints greased, you have metal on metal and the joints will wear out. If you don’t get enough cartilage building alkaline water and salt, your cartilage will degenerate and bone rubs on bone causing your joints to wear out and degenerate causing arthritis. According to Dr. Batmanghelidj, most so-called incurable dis-eases are nothing more than disease labels given to various stages of drought.
Thanks to Dr. Batmanghelidj, you have options. As always, Dr. B. recommends that you consult your doctor before making changes, especially where congestive heart failure and renal problems (related to liver and kidneys) may be a factor.

The pH Miracle Center IS A GIFT OF LOVE AND IS NOTHING MORE THAN GOD’S RECIPE FOR A HEALTHY LIFE. All that we ask is that when you are totally convinced that this discovery is true, then share it with everyone you can. There is only a handful of us who’ve taken on the most powerful system in our country, the .7 trillion pH Miracle Living Lifstyle and Dietary Plan. In no way are we blaming those of us who work in the system because this deadly system has created the problem and it must be reformed. According to Dr. B., the ignorance of healthcare is directly killing more than one million Americans a year by treating drought in the human body with drugs and money generating procedures. In reality, we are all contributing to this holocaust so long as we put profitability before responsibility.

This means that so long as we believe that our worth as human beings is measured in terms of money and power, we are contributing to everything that is taking away from the quality of our lives. No one is to blame for what is happening, but we are all responsible. May God protect us from ourselves?

The Alkaline pH of the Body: The Key to Prevention

After 25 years of research studying the affects lifestyle and diet on the pH of the blood, I have learned that the human organism is alkaline by design and acidic in all of its functions. If one can maintain the delicate alkaline pH of all the body fluids bathing every cell from within and from without at 7.365 then life will continue without pain, suffering, sickness or disease.

Louis Pasteur’s germ theory has become a curse. Antoine BeChamp an adversary to Pasteur and his germ theory for scientific fraud said this about the germ theory, “there is nothing so false that does not contain some element of truth, and so it is with the germ theory.” The germ theory is the controlling medical idea for the world. In Pasteur’s day, and ever since, other proposed theories about the cause of disease have fallen on death ear because they have tended to contradict that paradigm. NO matter how simple and logical an idea about the cause of disease, if it does not promote the concept of invasion of germs and their specific cures it does not fit into the medical paradigm.

More importantly, the germ theory has become a curse because it has encouraged individuals to give up responsibility for their own health over to the medical community. If germs cause disease it stands to reason that control belongs to the medical community whose tireless researchers spend trillions of our money to find the right pill or potion to annihilate disease-causing germs.

This quest to cure disease through medication is at the heart of modern allopathic medicine and the multi-trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry. It is a quest that persists despite evidence indicating that airborne germs do not cause the disease for which they are credited.
After more than a century of trying, the Pasteurian germ theory has utterly failed in the quest to a cure for any disease. All major degenerative diseases are on the increase, as are so called infectious diseases which are not infectious at all. Every year, old symptoms are given new names – names like MS for polio, AIDS for poor sanitation, poor nutrition, poor lifestyle choices and drug use, Epstein-Barr virus for connective tissue disorders like fibramyalgia – to make them appear to be the work of a new germ. Unless we turn this nonsense around, the human race could become extinct like the dinosaurs from the treatments of modern medicine to kill a non- threatening or phantom germ.

If we want to find the cure for disease we need only to look at our dietary and lifestyle choices. If you heed the ignored, even rejected discoveries of Pasteur’s peers and scientists of the 19th and 20th century, adding those to my own discoveries, you will learn the true cause of disease.
Until the medical community starts looking at causes rather than devoting its time looking for cures, and until we start taking responsibility for our own lifestyle and dietary choices, I believe the human race is in trouble of becoming extinct.

Dr. Benjamin Rush, Physician and signer of the Declaration of Independence, 1776 said this: “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize itself into an undercover dictatorship, To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic.”
Where does life begin? In the womb or the grail, the holy grail, in the amniotic fluid, in a 98.6 F, one percent water and salt solution or 1 part salt to 100 parts water. This solution is called the sol. This natural salt solution, called “sol” is from the origin of the word, directly connected to the word “soul”. What we call “sol” for our salt solution (a solution of two in one- no more polarity), was believed by the ancient Celtics to represent our soul, as the soul originated, in their belief, from the ocean where we are all born from the same fluids, arising from the same “sol” a solution of salt and water.

Our body in its wholeness is an ingenious creation of nature, It has been given all mechanisms to not only sustain its life but also to create new life. Every healthy person has innate regulatory mechanisms to maintain its alkaline design and self-healing powers, which ensure or reestablish the natural balance of the bodily functions, the homeostasis. It is not the doctor that heals us, nor the medication, but our own innate alkaline regulatory mechanisms. Our body is able to fully regenerate itself. Therefore, it is advised to use great discernment before labeling any disease as “incurable” or “untreatable.” If doctors come to the conclusion that a disease in incurable, they would be more accurate in saying that with their knowledge and experience, they are not able to offer any further help. The word “incurable” conveys fear, or false evidence appearing real, which stifles and weakens our body’s innate alkaline mechanism.

Bio-chemically speaking Health is all about alkaline balance. Bio-energetically speaking Health is all about energy. Vibrating energy is the origin of matter and the origin of life. And matter is nothing more than organized energy.

In 1984, the Swiss physicist Dr. Carlos Rubbia, received the Nobel prize for discovering a mathematically calculable natural constant with which he could calculate the ratio of mass particles (matter) in relation to navigating energy particles, The ratio of matter to energy that forms matter is 1 to 9,746 to the power of 108 or about 1 to 1,000,000,000 which means it takes one billion energy units to create one single unit of matter in a materialized tangible form. Isn’t interesting that we for the most part, preoccupy ourselves with only 1 billionth part of reality: that which is in a material form and can be seen and touched. We fail to see the far greater amount of energy particles it took to materialize our reality. This revolutionary scientific discovery shows us clearly that every form of matter is subject to higher energetic interactions and subject to change of form and function.

When we analyze the energy content of any form of matter, we arrive at its smallest part, the atom and its protons, electrons and neutrons. There is ongoing movement without any contact- nothing tangible, just pure vibrating energy. This vibrating energy creates a frequency, which can be measured, a so-called wave length which can be seen using my photon interference photography. Every form of matter is characterized as a specific frequency spectrum. And each frequency spectrum can be measured using a decibel meter. All organized matter is nothing more than organized energy that gives off a specific frequency and a specific sound which can be measured and heard. When we turn on a light or an electrical device we can see the energy but we cannot perceive the electrical current itself, but we except its existence. This same materially non-perceivable electricity, this energy, flows through our body fluids especially our blood. Every one of us has enough measurable electrical current flowing through us to light up a 100 watt light bulb.

Life/light = energy and energy = information or intelligence. Everything that exists not only exists as energy but also as a carrier of information or intelligence, whether it is a human being, a form of food or drink, or a rock. Life is a constant exchange of energy and intelligence and the best place to view this life energy is in the live and dried blood.

Plasma which is 92% water is a good example for showing how matter as energy is transformed when additional energy is added or subtracted. Water has three different distinct bodies or states: solid, liquid and gaseous. Ice is frozen water or like the thickening of the blood. We can see it and feel its coolness. By adding energy in the form of heat to the ice it transforms back into a liquid. When we add more energy to the water it begins to boil and the molecules start moving faster and faster that they begin to transform into steam and become gaseous. This transformation of organized energy as matter from one form to another is know as biological or energetical transformation or also referred to as pleomorphism.

Energy and intelligence are identical.
Every form of energy has a specific wavelength
Every wavelength has its individual content of intelligence
There are no accidents in the order of Nature
Meanwhile, we know of about 40,000 different diseases and the list is growing that are treated by the 1,200 different allopathic specialty fields with 58,000 different kinds of allopathic preparations or medicines. However, the word diseases in the plural form, is not a accurate. Have you ever heard of “healths”? We are either healthy or ill. This illness signals a lack of energy and shows up in the form of a symptom. To represent a symptom as an illness is technically and scientifically inaccurate. The symptom is merely the intelligent cry of the energetically defective and suffering body, crying out for help. And normally, the body turns to a weakened organ to give us a hint, through a symptom, that things are not in order.

Our bodies either hum or honk Upset stomachs or high blood pressure or high blood sugars is the body honking. The honks of our bodies are telling us there is a state of pH or energetic imbalance.
Why does pH balance or pH Homeostasis define good health?
pH balance or pH homeostasis in humans commonly refers to the internal balance of the body’s electro-magnetic and chemical systems in response to the changing conditions of the external world and the changing conditions of the internal world. The word homeostasis comes from the Greek words: “homeo” means similar or “alki” or “alkaline” and “stasis” means a tendency toward maintaining stability. There are many homoeostatic mechanisms in our bodies that help maintain this balance and our state of health is directly related to the health of these mechanisms. pH homeostasis is maintained by dynamic processes of feedback and regulation. pH homeostasis has only one objective: to preserve the beneficial conditions of life in the internal alkali environment. Every day we are bombarded with external influences that threaten that balanced internal alkaline pH environment. Some of these threats include becoming too hot or too cold, eating too much or eating acidic foods or drinks, breathing polluted air and being exposed to chemicals over a period of time.

Our cells, especially the red blood cells can only survive when our bodies are strong enough to maintain pH homeostasis or to regain it quickly after we have been exposed to toxic environmental threats. Some of the pH homoeostatic mechanisms in the body include temperature regulation, dilation of the eye, blood composition, heart rate, blood pressure, water content, blood sugar level, mineral relationships, and of course the acid/alkaline balance of our body fluids. An essential feature of these mechanisms is that they enable the red blood cells, the tissue which is a product of the red blood cells and the whole of the organism, also a product of blood, to adapt to changes in both internal and external environmental conditions. If the pH homoeostatic mechanisms are impaired the body loses its ability to regulate these mechanisms. By looking at living blood using a compound microscope we can view the quality of the red blood cell, its environment and how well the body is managing these pH homoeostatic mechanisms. The interdependence and close coordination of the many bodily functions, which work so well when we are in alkaline balance or health, may be upset by a chain reaction when any part of the system breaks down from metabolic acids which have not been properly eliminated through, respiration, perspiration or urination. If this chain reaction is too drastic, the red blood cells and body cells will become acidic and begin to biologically transform into other cellular forms – like bacteria or yeast.

The normal state of health is not a static condition, but a coordination response of many systems and mechanisms. Fluctuations occur within a very narrow pH range. An imbalance of a point or two on the acid/alkaline pH scale is extremely disruptive to health. A few percentiles of variation of oxygen concentration in the blood can impair function. In the bloodstream, the slightest changes can be observed in the structures of the red and white blood cells, the level of cellular debris, the creation of cholesterol or calcium crystals, etc. If the blood sugar content is continually elevated due to body cell transformation or breakdown, the body chemistry becomes upset. An infinitesimal deficiency of sodium, calcium, potassium or magnesium, the alkaline buffers of the body can cause a problem in the function of many body parts.

We must keep our pH homoeostatic mechanism strong so that we can deal effectively with our world. If we are humming and the process of pH homeostasis is orderly, life continues; if we are honking and m pH homeostasis is continually being disrupted, our health is in jeopardy.
pH Homeostasis is a bit like balancing the books in accounting. It si maintained by balancing inputs with outputs.

How well we adapt in health and sickness is largely a function of the pH homoeostatic mechanism. The body’s chemistry response to such subtle changes that a negative thought, an acidic food or drink, or eating too much food can be a problem for maintaining balance.

In 1988 an article of the New England Journal of Medicine stated that, “most major chronic disease probably results from the accumulation of environmental factors over time in genetically susceptible people.”

In 1965, Rene Dubos, a medical historian and philosopher, pointed out that the body is imperfect in its attempts to adapt and maintain pH homeostasis. She said, “the mechanisms involved in regulating homeostasis don not always return the body’s functions to their original state. They can be misdirected. The body only has the ability to adapt to insults for so long. When it can no longer adapt , degeneration sets in. Health is the state that the body attains when an individual responds adaptively and restores the body to its original integrity.”

The term “homeostasis” was coined in the mid-1920’s by the American physiologist, Walter B. Cannon. But he was building on a concept of balance that dated back to ancient Western, Eastern, and Middle Eastern civilizations.

The balance equals good health equation was first suggested by Hippocrates (460-375 BC) and the ancient Greeks. Hippocrates considered health to be a state of harmonious balance and disease a state of disharmony. He and his contemporaries believed that harmony and balance existed between organs, between bodily fluids, and between body and soul. When the body is out of harmony and balance, illness occurs.
Hippocrates studied the entire patient in his or her environment, noting the effects of climate, food, and occupation on health. “Our natures are the physicians of our diseases, ” he said, describing the healing forces we all have within us as the healing power of Nature. It was the physician’s objective to restore harmony with food, exercise, rest, and with medicinal remedies designed to remove the harmful acidic excesses. This conservative approach was designed to let nature do the healing and above all, as Hippocrates said, “to first do no harm.”

The Greeks ideas on equilibrium and health evolved further under the philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC). He felt that a healthy body worked through what he described as a hemostat, a device that returns the body to a state of equilibrium even when it is subjected to stimuli that disturbs this balance. Everything is tied to this state of equilibrium, including the psyche and emotions, and nothing could be regarded as a separate component. To lead a healthy life, the condition of balance had to be maintained, This could only be achieved if the body had an adequate feedback system, a means by which signals were transmitted to different parts of the body to help move it back into balance when it moved too far off alkaline center.

This psychological viewpoint was shared by another philosopher, Epicurus (341-270 BC). In his writing he referred to psychological stress and suggested that an individual’s quality of life could be improved by coping with what we would now describe as emotional stressors.

As early as about 120 AD in India, Eastern philosophers had reached similar ideas about the importance of balance in health. A general medical textbook from that time, the Caraks, described health as a balance of bodily elements know as dhatus, and a happy mental state called prasana.

The Middle Eastern approach incorporated the Hindu teachings with the Greco-Roman medical doctrine. Being base upon both religious and philosophical ideas, Islamic healing involved both body and soul.

Over 1000 years later, during the Middle Ages in Europe, good health was still linked to this notion of balanced physical, emotional, and spiritual state. To help people achieve this state, European hospitals were set up by religious orders and attached to abbeys, monasteries, and convents. Doctors prescribed diet, rest, sleep, exercise, and salt baths.

In 1600 Thomas Sydenham had begun classifying diseases, even though he believed disease was a result of imbalance, consistent with Hippocrates and Galen.

In 1628 Harvey traced the circulation of the blood, arguably perhaps the single greatest achievement in medicine.

In 1753 James Lind showed that Scurvy could be reversed with the limes that contain limonene – an antitoxic or antacid.

Doctors began to lose their way in 1796. In 1796 Benjamin Rush observed that all fevers were associated with flushed skin, he concluded that this was caused by distended capillaries and reasoned that the proximate cause of fever must be abnormal “convulsive action” in these vessels. He took this a step further and conclude that all fevers resulted from disturbances of capillaries and since the capillaries were part of the circulatory system, he concluded that a hypertension of the entire circulatory system was involved. Rush proposed to reduce this convulsive action by “depletion” or bleeding. A reminder that the medical establishment’s acceptance of bleeding exists today in the name of the
British Journal “The Lancet” one of the leading medical journals in the world. Today bleeding is called phlebotomy.

Also, In 1796 Edward Jenner took the pus from the runny sores of sick cows and injected it into the blood of his “patients. He thought that since pus is seen routinely in all kinds of wounds, pus was seen as a necessary part of healing.

In 1788 vaccinia was the bacteria that medical science suggested caused cowpox.

In 1830 the development of the first modern day achromatic microscope.

In 1835, Harvard’s Jacob Bigelow argued in a major address that in “the unbiased opinion of most medical men of sound judgement and long experience . . . the amount of death and disaster in the world would be less, if all disease were left to itself.”

In 1840 Jacob Henle in his essay, “On Miasmata and Contagia” first formulated the modern germ theory. He suggested that disease seem to germinate, grow and spread – like a first point or origin, a seed, a bacterium. The germ theory said that minute living organism invade the body, multiply and cause disease and that a specific germ causes a specific disease.

In 1850 Samule Thomson said, ” May the time soon come when men and women will become their own priest, physicians and lawyers – when self-government, equal rights and moral philosophy will take the place of all popular crafts of every description . . False theory and hypothesis constitute nearly the whole art of medicine.”

In 1860 Louis Pasteur suggested that living organisms, not a chemical chain reaction caused fermentation, winning converts to the germ theory.

In 1881 an American scientist George Sternberg was the first to isolate the fungus, pneumococcus and the first to observe the white blood cells engulfing bacteria, a key to understanding the immune system.

In 1882 a German, Robert Koch isolated the tubercle bacillus and declared it as the bacterium that caused tuberculosis that further confirmed the germ theory of Pasteur.

In 1884, German scientist Friedrich Loeffler isolated the diphtheria bacillus from throats of patients, grew it on a special medium (labs today call this Loeffler’s serum slope to grow the bacteria from suspected cases), and began carful experiments in animals that took several years. His work suggested that the bacteria themselves did not kill; the danger came from a toxin, diptherium, an acidic poison that the bacteria excreted as a waste product from sugar metabolism.

In 1885 Max von Pettenkofer insisted that Koch’s bacteria were only one of many factors in the causation of disease. His dispute with Koch became increasingly bitter and passionate. Petterkofer determined to prove himself right, prepared test tubes thick with lethal cholera bacteria. Then he and several of his students drank them down. All survived. Petterkofer claimed victory that germs do not cause disease.

In 1889 Pasteur’s proteges, Emile Roux and Alexandre Yersin grew broth thick with diphtheria bacteria and used compressed air to force broth through a filter of unglazed porcelain. The filter was designed by Charles Chamber land, a physicist working with Pasteur; though only a tool, the filter itself would prove to be immensely important. NO bacteria or solids could pass through the porcelain. Only liquid could. They then sterilized this liquid. It still killed. That proved that bacteria, an insoluble could not kill, but a soluble, an acidic toxin did the KILLING.

The cure from diphtheria was not in killing the bacteria but neutralizing the acids or excretions from the bacteria.

In 1900 Frederick Gates and intellect and Baptist Minister and an assistant to John D. Rockefeller, saw an opportunity to exploit the medical field because of its admitted uncertainty and ignorance of the time. He had organized many business ventures for the Rockfellers’ and convinced John D Rockefeller to open the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. The Rockefeller Institute saw medicine itself as its field from its earliest existence scientists studying disease based upon the germ theory of Pasteur.

In 1901, William Henry Welch was hired by John D. Rockefeller to set up the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. William Henry Welch was steeped in the germ theory and established its strong hold on the medical model. You might call Dr. Welch the Father of American Medicine and the perpetrator of the Pasteurian Germ Theory.

After the civil war medicine had discovered drugs – such as quinine, digitalis and opium of which Oliver Wendell Homes the physician Father of the Supreme Court justice said, “I firmly believe that if the whole materia medica, as now used, could be sunk to the bottom fo the sea, it would be all the better for mankind – and all the worse for the fishes.”
In 1911, the head of the school training French army doctors in public health said that germs alone were “powerless to create an epidemic.” But it was too late, this particular view was now considered simply a minority opinion. The germ theory now had its hold on the governments of the world!

In 1911, the medical establishments made up a story that Peyton Rous discovered a bacteria that caused cancer and received a Noble Prize for his discovery posthumous in 1966. This gave rise to the term virus named after Peyton Rous’s bacteria. Peyton Rous never suggested this in any of his research that his bacteria caused disease let alone cancer. This story gave rise to a new group of bacteria called filterable bacteria that the medical community now refers to as virus – beginning 1996. There is NO scientific evidence that shows that virus’s have ever caused ANY disease.
These ideas of balance were some distance from those of earlier societies that ascribed illness to the supernatural powers they believed governed their lives. The Babylonians, the Egyptians, the ancient Americans saw disease as an entity unto itself, a potent demon that struggled to dominate, attacked, penetrated, and possibly even killed its unfortunate host.

Offend the Gods, an ancestor, or an evil witch and be struck down as punishment. Lead a sinful life and you were tempting fate.
Of course, we perceive that these ideas about disease are no longer widely believed, which makes it all more the ironic that Pasteur’s germ theory has had and still has a stranglehold on 19th, 20th and now 21st century medicine. As medical writer Alberto Seguin described in an article entitled, “The Concept of Disease,” the demonic idea of disease reached its full height with the germ theory. It became possible to bring together rational and scientific thought with irrational tendency to personalize disease. The germ in what ever name it is called, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Hunta, HIV, Anthrax, SARS and now AVIAN, are the scientific demon, the curse, the lie and the fraud that is said to attack and kill!

If we will consider disease as a symptom of disease not the cause, then the germ is nothing more than an expression of imbalance and a biological transformation of what use to be organized to that which is changing into a new form. This was my discovery in 1994. I witnessed biological transformation as seen on pg. 126 of my book “Sick and Tired” the transformation of a rod bacteria back into a red blood cell and then back into a bacterial rod. I knew for the first time that bacteria was not a demon, not an entity but a transformation, a new formation of a preceding form. Not the cause of disease but the expression of a change in the internal environment which had given rise to change. For several years I felt alone in this discovery until I learned of the works of the giants that proceeded me that had their finger on the magic of life.
Claude Bernard (1813-1878) “The terrain is everything the germ is nothing.” And upon the death bed of Louis Pasteur admitting to Claude Bernard that he was right in 1895.

Antoine BeChamp (1816-1908) “Disease is born in us and from us.”

Florence Nightingale – a famous nurse (1820 -1910)

Mathias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann (1839)

Gunther Enderlein ((1872- 1968)

Walter B. Cannon (1871-1945) “Only by understanding the wisdom of the body shall we attain the mastery of disease and pain that will enable us to relieve the burden of the people.”

Royal Raymond Rife (1888-1971)

Wilhelm Reich (1897 – 1957)

Gaston Naessans (1924-2005)

Philosophically speaking, Pasteur had an ally in Napoleon III, who came to power in 1852. The Emperor believed in a police state and in using complete control to rule. Pasteur’s mechanistic idea of disease, finding the right cure for each germ, fit into this philosophy of control.

Giving the responsibility to the any government to cure disease is giving up control. It takes responsibility – and power – away from the individual. In the words of Antoine BeChamp, “there is nothing so false that does not contain some element of truth and so it is with the germ theory.”

One of six of us will become diabetic
One of three of us will develop cancer
One of two of us will develop cardiovascular disease
One of six couples will suffer from unexplained infertility.
One of seven women in the US will develop breast cancer.
We need to get out to the disease business. If we want to understand health, energy and vitality then we need to study the people who are healthy. Over the last 25 years I have been studying health and how it relates to the blood. Viewing live and dried blood is the pinnacle of understanding health and how to achieve health with alkaline foods, drinks, exercise, breathing, getting adequate rest, etc.

Now, I pray and hope that you will realize that we are all responsible for our own health – you alone. A medical practitioner can only help to relieve symptoms. Ultimately, you are the one who has to take charge. Health is a choice just as disease is a choice. You are responsible for what goes into your mouth and what comes out of your mouth, as well as for what you think, feel and do. Health is all about choices and consequences.

The health and energy of the human organism is the knowledge that are bodies are alkaline by design and acidic by function and the best way to maintain that alkaline design is through an alkaline lifestyle and diet.

Not part of our healthy alkaline community? For more information go to: www.phmiracleliving.com

Cell Phones May Harm Male Fertility

A study of more than 350 men has found that those who use a cell phone for more than four hours a day have fewer sperm, and also poorer quality sperm.

The study’s author suggested that radiation from mobile phones might harm sperm by damaging DNA, the cells that produce testosterone, or the tubes where sperm is produced.

But another expert has argued that the problem was likely not the cell phones themselves that were the cause, but rather the sedentary nature of the cell phone users.

Men who talked on the phone for more than four hours a day had the lowest average sperm counts (50 million per milliliter), and the least healthy sperm.

Those who talked between two and four hours a day averaged sperm counts of 69 million per milliliter, and had moderately healthy sperm. Those who did not use mobile phones at all had sperm counts of 86 million per milliliter, on average, and the healthiest sperm.

BBC News October 24, 2006

CBS News October 23, 2006

For more information on how to protect yourself from radiation from cell phones, microwaves, computers, hair dryers, etc., visit our website at:http://www.phmiracleliving.com/innerlink.htm

Flesh Eating Bacteria

In answer to a recently received question on this condition…

Dear B,

Concerning your question on flesh eating bacteria or a strain of Group A streptococcus is a biological transformation of the skin or tissue cells. Since the skin is the largest elimination organ for metabolic waste products when the acidity of the skin builds up the cells begin to transform into streptococcus bacteria. This phenomenon is called pleomorphism. The streptococcus is not what eats the skin but the metabolic acids in combination with exotoxin B, a waste product or acid from the streptococcus or cysteine protease which destroys flesh faster than it can be replaced. To treat streptococcus with antibiotics is like putting kerosene on an already burning fire. Acid on top of acid excelerates the transformation of the skin or tissue cells which gives birth to more and more bacteria and in turn more and more exotoxins. In theory, the streptococcus is not the cause of the tissue breakdown but the symptom or the result of the tissue breakdown. The cause of this condition is the over-acidification of the tissue due to latent tissue acidosis or the built up of acids in the tissue that are not being properly eliminated through urination. Check the morning pH of the urine and you will find that the pH is below 6 when it should be at least 6.8 and ideally 7.2. The only solution to the problem I percieve topically is to alkalize the skin with high pH compounds, (10.5 to 12.5) i.e., sodium bicarbonate, potassium hydroxide, magnesium carbonate and/or sodium chlorite. These compounds can be applied to the skin by spraying the area of outfection every hour to raise the pH of the skin and thus reversing or stopping the cellular transformation of tissue cells to bacteria. This compound will neutralize the toxic and degenerative effects of exotoxin B without breaking or destroying the healthy tissue.

Finally, to deal with problems of the skin properly you must start from the inside out rather than from the outside in. I would suggest a high alkaline diet and supplement program as outlined in our book, The pH Miracle for Weight Loss, Chapter 11. Please disregard the fact that I am addressing weight loss here instead of skin problems but the solution is the same. In order to have healthy skin you must maintain the alkaline design of the human organism and the acidic functions of the body and their associated acidic waste products are better eliminated through urination instead of through the tissues or pores of the skin. Bottom line if you clean up the internal environment with an alkaline lifestyle and diet you will clear up the skin. The skin is only an expression of what is happening from within. The good news here is at least the metabolic acids and the exotoxins are not breaking down a major organ that sustains life – – at least for now.

I hope this information will be helpful.

Kindest Regards,

Dr. Robert O. Young
www.phmiracleliving.com

Not part of our Community yet? Visit us at www.phmiracleliving.com and join us now!

ph Miracle Center
16390 Dia Del Sol
Valley Center, California
92082
US

The Current Illusion of Flu’s, Colds, Viruses and Vaccines

Tonight I will be discussing flu's, colds, fevers, viruses and
vaccines in an interactive web-based teleseminar at 6 pm Pacific.
To sign up and get your access code call: 760 751 8321

The purpose of this teleseminar is to reveal the illusion of the
germ theory that imprisons many us and to study the history of
how this illusion was created.

One must challenge everything in the modern construct of
immunology and what is said to be the immune system. The basis
of modern immunology is founded on Louis Pasteur, the fraud,
impostor, deceiver and self promoter. There is a serious problem
to where every word and part of the anatomy must be questioned to
find their use and function because of the fraud of Louis Pasteur.

For example, the word influenza means influence. Originally,
influenza was said to come from the stars or heavens. The Avian
Influenza is an influenza of a bird influence. More specifically,
it is an influence of bird waste. The bird consumption industry
in Southeast Asia is overcrowded to the point that the chickens
are consuming their own waste, producing an over-acidification
of the birds and workers that must work in the acidic air and waste.

It could be more accurately called Acidic Bird or Chicken Excrement
Influenza that is only contagious to those consuming acidic birds,
like chicken or breathing chemically altered air from chicken
excrement. Because chickens do not have a urinary tract system,
like humans and animals they are more likely to absorb their own
acidic urine into their tissues. I guess you could say that's what
makes chicken flesh or turkey flesh taste so juicy and why chickens or
turkeys should never be consumed by humans!

Here is a second example of Pasteurian scientific dogma. The word
virus is originally Latin meaning poison, as in snake venom,
(being too acidic). When a serious snake bite releases venom or
acid into the skin and soft tissues, the small sweat vessels become
so enlarged that red corpuscles can flow into the tiny seat glands,
showing red skin patterns and allowing the venom or acids to escape
through the skin. Acidity dissolves and enlarges blood vessels for the
movement of acidic fluids or gases. Alkalinity constricts and normalizes
the blood vessels.

The point being that viruses are molecular liquids or gases (venom)
that can be created by chemical imbalances in humans, plants and
animals (by malnutrition or toxic acidic food and/or drink consumption),
also created in humans, plants and animal glands, sometimes used in
defense (snake venom) or emergency (overactive adrenals), also can be
crystalized in laboratories, rarely, if ever crystallized in vivo,
and foolish to call viruses contagious when viruses are nothing more
than acidic liquids or gases from biological transformation or rotting
matter. In snake bites, lifestyle choices and diets -- it is not the
bite or food that kills it is the venom or acid from the food that
kills. Ultimately, it is inones personal choice that gives life or
takes life!

My final example is in defining the truth about antibodies and antigens.
Antibodies are chemical clusters or alkaline buffers to a typical acidic
condition properly referred to as antigens or enzymes. So called
antibodies are released from healthy organ cells, such as the liver,
in response to buffer and neutralize the acidity or liquid acid antigen
that was first introduced. It must be noted that the word, antibody and
antigen, are a Pasteurian dogma construct. The mind set being that an
antibody or now even antibiotics, are defending or responding to bodies,
microbes or invisible bodies or what I call phantom viruses, like
Avian, SARS, or even HIV -- even though HIV is not a virus but an
alkaline antibody to buffer acid or antigens. The chemical response is
actually due to an introduction, vector or antigen of a chemical nature,
typically acidic, not a body, microbe or bacteria or yeast.

If bacteria, yeast, fungus or mold are transferred into another
individual it must be made in a balanced liquid medium to support
that fragile microbe or insignificant entity in order to survive.
The main point here is that bacteria, yeast, fungus or mold do not
cause sickness and disease --- sickness and disease is a result of
excess acidity or antigens that have not been properly buffered
by antibodies or bases such as sodium bicarbonate. These fragile
microforms are the expression of cellular transformation from once
healthy human, plant or animal cells due to an over acidic environment.
Sickness and disease can only be caused by the over acidification
(abundance of antigens) of the fluids of the body due to our own
personal lifestyle and dietary choices.

So this Holiday Season, as we contemplate the flu season (no coincidence
that they occur at the same time considering the ingestion of all the
acidic foods and drinks) may I suggest that each of us take personal
responsibility for the consequences of our choices, rather than blame a
phantom Avian Influenza virus. If we get sick it is our own fault and not
the cause of a phantom virus that we can blame to cover our own
transgressions. Save your money and save your life by making alkalizing
and energizing lifestyle and dietary choices. This is where true immunity
is found -- not in a vaccine which are all acidic and poisonous to
the body.

I love the words of Hippocrates when he said, 'Let your medicine be
your food and your food be your medicine.'

In closing, I quote Abraham Lincoln who said ' . . . but you can't
fool all the people, all of the time.'

Is it now time that we wake up from the fraud and deception of
Louis Pasteur's medical science and break the chains that can prevent
us from incredible outstanding good health, energy and a long a
prosperous life free from all sickness and disease? Is it not time for
us to be truly free in all ways -- physically, emotionally and spiritually?

I believe with all my heart that the answers to these questions can be
found and realized in understanding and choosing truth, light and life
over deception, darkness and death. For the truth can and will always
set us free in all ways!

I hope you will join me tonight at 6 pm Pacific time for an interactive
teleseminar where you can even ask questions. Give us a call NOW at;
760 751 8321

In love, light and life,

Dr. Robert O. Young

PS For more information on flu, viruses, and vaccines I refer you to our
book, 'Sick and Tired: and the technical essay called, 'A Second Thought
About Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis.'
Go to:
http://www.phmiracleliving.com/books.htm

PPS. To learn more about balancing the body through Alkalizing & Energizing,
see our DVD's at:
http://www.phmiracleliving.com/videos.ht

ph Miracle Center

16390 Dia Del Sol
Valley Center, California
92082
US

Chemotherapy Alters Normal Brain Function

A UCLA study has shown that chemotherapy can change the blood flow and metabolism of the brain in ways that can linger for 10 years or more after treatment. This could help explain the confusion, sometimes called “chemo brain,” reported by many chemotherapy patients.

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to scan the brains of 21 women who had undergone breast cancer surgery five to 10 years earlier. Sixteen had been treated with chemotherapy regimens. Thirteen control subjects, who never had breast cancer or chemotherapy, were also scanned.

The scans took place as the women performed short-term memory exercises, and while they were resting. The scans showed that there was a rapid jump in activity in the frontal cortexes and cerebellums of the chemotherapy patients as they performed the memory tests, indicating that they were working harder than the control patients to recall the same information.

The study also revealed that women who underwent hormonal therapy in addition to chemotherapy showed changes to their basal ganglia, a part of the brain that bridges thought and action. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment September 29, 2006Daniel H. S. Silverman1, 6 Contact Information, Christine J. Dy1, Steven A. Castellon2, 5, Jasmine Lai1, Betty S. Pio1, Laura Abraham3, Kari Waddell3, Laura Petersen3, Michael E. Phelps1 and Patricia A. Ganz3(1) Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA(2) Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, University of California, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA(3) Division of Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA(4) UCLA Schools of Medicine & Public Health, University of California, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA(5) Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA(6) Ahmanson Biological Imaging Division, CHS AR-144 UCLA Medical Center, MC694215, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6942, USAReceived: 10 August 2006 Accepted: 11 August 2006 Published online: 29 September 2006

Abstract Purpose To explore the relationship of regional cerebral blood flow and metabolism with cognitive function and past exposure to chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Patients and methods Subjects treated for breast cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy remotely (5-10 years previously) were studied with neuropsychologic testing and positron emission tomography (PET), and were compared with control subjects who had never received chemotherapy. [O-15] water PET scans was acquired during performance of control and memory-related tasks to evaluate cognition-related cerebral blood flow, and [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans were acquired to evaluate resting cerebral metabolism. PET scans were analyzed by statistical parametric mapping and region of interest methods of analysis.

Results During performance of a short-term recall task, modulation of cerebral blood flow in specific regions of frontal cortex and cerebellum was significantly altered in chemotherapy-treated subjects. Cerebral activation in chemotherapy-treated subjects differed most significantly from untreated subjects in inferior frontal gyrus, and resting metabolism in this area correlated with performance on a short-term memory task previously found to be particularly impaired in chemotherapy-treated subjects. In examining drug-class specific effects, metabolism of the basal ganglia was significantly decreased in tamoxifen + chemotherapy-treated patients compared with chemotherapy-only breast cancer subjects or with subjects who had not received chemotherapy, while chemotherapy alone was not associated with decreased basal ganglia activity relative to untreated subjects.

Conclusion Specific alterations in activity of frontal cortex, cerebellum, and basal ganglia in breast cancer survivors were documented by functional neuroimaging 5-10 years after completion of chemotherapy.

Science Blog October 5, 2006

USA Today October 5, 2006

For more information on pH Miracle Living and the pH Miracle for Cancer visit our website at:www.phmiracleliving.com” or http://www.phmiracleliving.com

ph Miracle Center
16390 Dia Del Sol
Valley Center, California
92082
US

The E-coli and Spinach Myth

In the most recent headlines associated with E-coli from spinach where medical savants suggest caused kidney failure and then death of several people, I perceive I am left to ask some very important questions — “how were these folks living, eating, drinking and thinking?” Was the real cause of death from a germ called E-coli or was it the acidic waste products from digestion and metabolism from lifetsyle and dietary choices that killed or shut down the function of the kidneys?

The non-profit organization, Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine began tracking folks having health challenges. For example, in the Good Medicine Magazine from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Volume XIII, Number 1, addressed medical complaints from users of protein diets such as Atkins and South Beach.

Here is how they responded:

Loss of energy 50%
Constipation 50%
Bad Breath 34%
Difficulty concentrating 31%
Gallbladder problems 14%
Heart problems 10%
Reduced kidney function 9%
Kidney stones 9%
Elevated cholesterol 8%
Gout 6%
Osteoporosis 6%

Other problems cited include colon polyps, colon cancer, other forms of cancer, heart attacks, severe stomach problems, irritable bowel syndrome, arotic aneurysm, daily hives, elevated iron levels, rheumatoid arthritis, brain hemorrhage, diverticulitis/osis, dizziness, lightheadedness, nausea, headaches, cramps, diarrhea and numbness in limbs, just to name a few. In 1997, the largest study in the world on food, nutrition and the prevention and cause of cancer was published in a 670 page report by the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Cancer Reserach (AICR). This very important ten year study is called, “Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective.” The researchers listed protein from animals and fish as the number one cause of cancer of the kidney, prostate, breast, colon, rectum and pancreas. They also listed vegetables, including spinach as the number one food to prevent and cure cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, oesopharus, lung stomach, pancreas, liver, colon, rectum, breast, ovary, ednometrium, cervix, prostate, thyroid, kidney and bladder.

Starting Thursday, November 9th at 6 pm, in a new 2-week interactive teleseminar, I will demystifying the cause of all sickness and disease, including cancer and give you straightforward solutions to all of your health questions.

To register or for more information for this life saving and life changing teleseminar go to:http://www.phmiracleliving.com/ (on the side bar hit calender to register) or call:760 751 8321.

I guess you might say that acidic lifestyle and diets are to die for not live for.

In love and light,

Dr. Robert O. Young
ph Miracle Center
16390 Dia Del Sol
Valley Center, California
92082
US

%d bloggers like this: