Tag Archives: COVID-19

“You Can’t Handle the Truth!”

“You Can’t Handle the Truth” was a line in the movie, “A Few Good Men” – Please watch and listen before reading the rest of this short but very important article!

This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid – 19 fatalities!

Table 1 has counts of death involving COVID-19 and select causes of death by sex and age group for the United States.

The real and truthful numbers (unlike those reported by the fake news) reflect that only 6% of all 164,280 deaths recorded actually died from Covid-19!

Table 2 presents death counts of COVID-19 and other select causes of death by the place of death.

What this means is the real number of fatalities for COVID-19 in the USA amount to 9,857 deaths out of the erroneous 164,280 deaths!

Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned.

The other 94% fatalities had 2-3 other serious primary illnesses (like diagnosed cancer or heart disease) with the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age. (Over 85 years of age as shown in Table 1 on the red line in the graph)

Please check out the CDC link below for verifying the truth about COVID-19 as seen from their own produced Tables 1, 2 and 3!

This whole COVID-19 Worldwide Pandemic has truly been a HUGE fraud perpetuated upon the entire human race! COVID-19 is NOT a Pandemic but a Plannedemic! orchestrated by some very ‘Bad Actors’ who have a ‘GOD COMPLEX’ and who only care about themselves!

Their slogan should be ‘NO LIVES MATTER’ except theirs!

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#Comorbidities

Now my question to you is this – Can YOU Handle the Truth and then open your mouth and save yourself and your loved ones from the real agenda behind COVID-19 – the mass execution of over 7 billion people by chemical, biological and electromagnetic poisoning?

Read and learn more at: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-mindset-of-dr-robert-o-young-1

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-mindset-of-dr-robert-o-young-1

Do YOUR own research and verify the truth! And then become a beacon of hope and light to ALL those souls you love and care about! Time is running out on humanity! Act NOW before it is too late!

PLease share this information with everyone you love and care about! Time is of the essence!

http://www.drrobertyoung.com/blog

Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Robert Young – re COVID, Vaccines, Viruses, FACE MASKS AND MORE!

UPDATE:  THIS SHOW HAS BEEN UPLOADED TO BITCHUTE AND IS AVAILABLE TO VIEW BELOW!!.

August 26, 2020 @ 7 PM PT  –  A roundtable discussion with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Robert O. Young regarding COVID, Vaccines and Viruses.  We will cover the latest announcement by President Trump with regard to the new Plasma Treatment, as well as the latest CDC announcement saying asymptomatic people do not need to be tested! (articles and bio(s) linked below).

WATCH ON BITCHUTE at: https://www.bitchute.com/video/28tPzE4q3L4p/?fbclid=IwAR0UcMa8Ms7QSdSS34ZprNBYhVNQWmBNggNjNUoRbbu0wO4N_m_gJc5mqoE

CDC… ASYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE DO NOT NEED TO BE TESTED!

www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-coronavirus-testing-guidance-change

PLASMA TREATMENT AUTHORIZED BY FDA ANNOUNCED BY TRUMP

www.cnbc.com/2020/08/23/trump-will-reportedly-announce-emergency-authorization-for-covid-19-plasma-treatment.html

BIO(S) AND LINKS BELOW:

DR. ROBERT O. YOUNG:

To learn more and find products go to:  www.phmiracleproducts.com/

UPDATE:  

DR. ROBERT YOUNG

COVID Autopsies Prove Death by Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation or Pulmonary Thrombosis!

To read the entire article go to: www.drrobertyoung.com/so/e8N7-HFDl?cid=8486780f-da1f-4521-b90f-6e16cd07da5c#/main

“Dear Kerry, Thank you for the opportunity to share the New Biology. I didn’t mention were people may buy our nutritional products and I know that there lots of interest around the world. Please post this information below my video. All our bestsellers including those I have mentioned in my interview can be found at www.phmiracleproducts.com For International orders we suggest to email product names, quantity, Person’s name, address, phone number and email to phmiracleproducts@gmail.com and we will help everyone who contacts us. If someone would like to have a consultation with me they can book it on my personal website here www.drrobertyoung.com/services-page.

Thank you again, Best regards,

Dr. Robert Young”

ABOUT BIOWEAPONS:  …”Biolabs are acid labs.  There are NO bioweapons.  Germs are born in us and from us.  Viruses are acidic waste from cellular breakdown or fermentation.  Antibiotics have been the result.  Which are nothing more or less than the acidic waste of fermentation.  In other words, you take a yeast-like penicillium and ferment sugar and you end up with the so-called antibiotic which is the acid waste from fermentation.  It is morbid thinking to believe you can cure disease with disease.”

–Dr. Robert O. Young

RE: EMF see more research on this at: 

www.drrobertyoung.com

Short bio: “Dr. Young may be on the threshold of a new biology, whose principle—if proven—could revolutionize the biology and medicine worlds.” Neil Solomon, M.D., Ph.D. Former Head of Research for John Hopkins University.

Over the past two and a half decades, Robert O. Young has been widely recognized as one of the top research scientists in the world. Throughout his career, his research has been focused at the cellular level. Having a specialty in cellular nutrition, Dr. Young has devoted his life to researching the true causes of “disease,” subsequently developing “The New Biology™” to help people balance their life.

In 1994, Dr. Young discovered the biological transformation of red blood cells into bacteria and bacteria to red blood cells. He has since documented several such transformations.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/gQnWvaQCr-w?autoplay=0&mute=0&controls=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drrobertyoung.com&playsinline=1&showinfo=0&rel=0&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&enablejsapi=1&widgetid=7

Dr. Robert Young has devoted his career to the discovery of the missing pieces necessary to complete the larger picture of health.–taken from his website, www.drrobertyoung.com/

DR. YOUNG’S LATESE SCIENTIFIC PAPER:

THE TRUTH ABOUT CORONA AND HOW TO PREVENT AND/OR REVERSE THE CORONA EFFECT

www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-truth-about-corona-and-how-to-prevent-and-or-reverse-the-corona-effect

How the World Became Infected

NOTE:  Considering Dr. Young’s premise, within the current world situation and how we got here.  The ‘weaponization of acidic rain (made from our cellular acidic waste in bioweapns labs) then distributed in clouds and ultimately acidic rain (or mist) that falls upon us you have the delivery mechanism for creating a worldwide pandemic.  Add 5G being activated in various key cities and you have the heavy concentrations of acid rain coupled with 5G and that results in an irradiated soup all around us and the effect is a high incidence of disease.

Google definition of “irradiation” – Irradiation is the process by which an object is exposed to radiation. … The term irradiation usually excludes the exposure to non-ionizing radiation, such as infrared, visible light, microwaves from cellular phones or electromagnetic waves emitted by radio and TV receivers and power supplies.”  The words “usually excludes” are suspect as one can easily see on the contrary in our world becoming irradiated most likely includes radiation, electromagnetic waves emitted by cell phones and TVs as well as 4G and now 5G in some places and significant radiation from leaking nuclear power plants (such as Fukushima).

DR. JUDY MIKOVITS

See website:  plaguethebook.com/

Dr. Judy Mikovits bio:

#1 on Amazon Charts, New York Times Bestseller, USA Today BestsellerOver 100,000 Copies in Print!

“Kent Heckenlively and Judy Mikovits are the new dynamic duo fighting corruption in science.” —Ben Garrison, America’s #1 political satirist

Dr. Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin, a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys’ club of science with her groundbreaking discoveries. And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men, she uncovered decades-old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried.

From her doctoral thesis, which changed the treatment of HIV-AIDS, saving the lives of millions, including basketball great Magic Johnson, to her spectacular discovery of a new family of human retroviruses, and her latest research which points to a new golden age of health, Dr. Mikovits has always been on the leading edge of science.

With the brilliant wit one might expect if Erin Brockovich had a doctorate in molecular biology, Dr. Mikovits has seen the best and worst of science. When she was part of the research community that turned HIV-AIDS from a fatal disease into a manageable one, she saw science at its best. But when her investigations questioned whether the use of animal tissue in medical research were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases, such as autism and chronic fatigue syndrome, she saw science at its worst. If her suspicions are correct, we are looking at a complete realignment of scientific practices, including how we study and treat human disease.

Recounting her nearly four decades in science, including her collaboration of more than thirty-five years with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founders of the field of human retrovirology, this is a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity.”–from book on Amazon linked below.…

”Analysis by multiple independent groups have estimated that Part 1 has received “over one billion views,” making it the most viewed and banned documentary of all time.

If you were brave enough to share the controversial information, thank you! Because of you, the movie has been subtitled in numerous languages and is currently viral in other countries. As a result, a coalition of 27,000 plus scientists and doctors have gathered in support of a movement to reform our corrupt global healthcare system.

We are currently in production on Plandemic Part 2 and over the past few weeks we’ve interviewed top legal and medical experts that have validated nearly every claim made by Dr Judy Mikovits in Part 1. Part 2 will set the record straight and further expose the blatant lies Big Pharma and Big Media are using to silence a brave woman who simply refuses to bow down to those who profit from keeping us unhealthy and addicted.”–Kent Heckenlively, co-author 

Does a Cloth or Surgical Mask Provide Protection Against chemical, Radiation or Biological Pollutants?

Cloth Masks (CM) and Surgical Masks (SM)

The pores or opening sizes in cloth and surgical masks range from 80 to 500 microns, which is much larger than particular matter (PM) in the nano micro range such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen cyanide(HCN), titanium dioxide (TiO2), aluminum dioxide, carbon dioxide (CO2)l, bacteria, or even bacterphages or exosomes sometimes referred to the virus. Therefore, any of the above cloth or surgical masks are useless and provide no possible protection against PM less than 80 microns and nothing in the nano micron range.(See Figure 1)

Figure 1 – Biologicals and Chemicals Based Upon Size

The filtering efficiency of all six of the above selected masks may potentially filter out PM larger than 80 microns such as pollen, dust or hair. Based upon the sizes of bacteria, yeast, molds, endotoxins, bateriophages, exosomes (so-called viruses), carbon monoxide emissions and factory emissions of nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, aluminum dioxide, including electrical and magnetic fields (EMF), cloth and surgical masks provide absolutely NO filtering efficiency of PM smaller than 80 microns due to their larger open pores present in all cloth and surgical masks. (See Figure 2 – A through F are cloth masks and G through I are surgical masks)

Figure 2 – Using Bright Field Microscopy at 100x You Can See the Open Pores Ranging From 9 to over 500 microns. The Scale Bar in Micrograph A is 500 Microns

Surface Characterization

The representative bright fieldmicroscopy images of different CMs and SMs are shown in Figure 2. Out of 20 CMs (CM1-CM20) imaged, for brevity, images of CM1, CM3, CM7, CM9, CM12, CM18 are shown in A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively. The bright patches in the bright field microscopy images are the pores present in the masks. All CMs viewed contained two ply (layers) and the surface characteristics of both layers was very similar.

For comparison, you can view the surface of seven different brands of paper/SMs masks available on the market. The SM masks examined contained two or three layers (two or three ply). The surface morphology of the inner, middle, and outer layers of a three ply SM is shown in Figure 2 G, H and I. These micrographs showed a mean range of pores for the CM and the SM from 81 to 461 microns.

Conclusion

Based upon viewing and measuring the pore sizes of the CM and the SM using bright field microscopy at 100x magnification both types of masks were found to be incapable of filtering PM smaller than 81 microns. Because of the size ranges of PM9[see Figure 4], such as tobacco smoke, bacteria, yeast, mold, endotoxins, mycotoxins, exotoxins, exosomes, bacteriophages, air pollutants of nitrogen dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, aluminum dioxide, EMF, etc. the wearing of a cloth or surgical mask provides no protection from disease causing chemical, biological, electrical or magnetic pollution.[See Figure 3]

Figure 4 – Showing Particulate Matter (PM) Measuring From 0.001 Nano Microns to 10,000 Microns

Additional Questions

1) What type of mask will I need to wear in order to protect myself from small micro particles and even smaller nana particles?

2. Will social distancing provide protection against small micro and even smaller nano particulate matter?

The answer is a big NO because micro and nano particles are all around ux especially in the larger cities where you find elevated PM from increased air pollution and electrical and magnetic poLlution

WUHON, CHINA ON A TYPICAL DAY

References

Belkin (1997) Belkin NL. The evolution of the surgical mask: filtering efficiency versus effectiveness. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 1997;18(1):49–57. doi: 10.1086/647501. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cherrie et al. (2018) Cherrie JW, Apsley A, Cowie H, Steinle S, Mueller W, Lin C, Horwell CJ, Sleeuwenhoek A, Loh M. Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018;75(6):446–452. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104765. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Chughtai, Seale & MacIntyre (2013) Chughtai AA, Seale H, MacIntyre CR. Use of cloth masks in the practice of infection control—evidence and policy gaps. International Journal of Infection Control. 2013;9(3):1–12. doi: 10.3396/ijic.v9i3.020.13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Colbeck, Nasir & Ali (2010) Colbeck I, Nasir ZA, Ali Z. The state of indoor air quality in Pakistan—a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2010;17(6):1187–1196. doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0293-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Drey, Graber & Bieschke (2013) Drey LL, Graber MC, Bieschke J. Counting unstained, confluent cells by modified bright-field microscopy. BioTechniques. 2013;55(1):28–33. doi: 10.2144/000114056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Gurung & Bell (2012) Gurung A, Bell ML. Exposure to airborne particulate matter in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 2012;22(3):235–242. doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.14. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Hell (2007) Hell SW. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science. 2007;316(5828):1153–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.1137395. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

IQ Air (2018) IQ Air 2018 World air quality report: regional and city PM2.5 ranking. 2018. https://www.airvisual.com/ https://www.airvisual.com/

Kim, Kabir & Kabir (2015) Kim K-H, Kabir E, Kabir S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environment International. 2015;74:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

MacIntyre & Chughtai (2015) MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. Facemasks for the prevention of infection in healthcare and community settings. BMJ. 2015;350:h694. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h694. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

MacIntyre et al. (2015) MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, Hien NT, Nga PT, Chughtai AA, Rahman B, Dwyer DE, Wang Q. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Maleki et al. (2016) Maleki H, Sorooshian A, Goudarzi G, Nikfal A, Baneshi MM. Temporal profile of PM 10 and associated health effects in one of the most polluted cities of the world (Ahvaz, Iran) between 2009 and 2014. Aeolian Research. 2016;22:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.08.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Maxted (2011) Maxted B. Dust masks for Indian quarry workers: a comparative analysis of the filtering efficiency of fabrics. Journal of Humanitarian Engineering. 2011;1:15–20. [Google Scholar]

Mirowsky et al. (2013) Mirowsky J, Hickey C, Horton L, Blaustein M, Galdanes K, Peltier RE, Chillrud S, Chen LC, Ross J, Nadas A, Lippmann M, Gordon T. The effect of particle size, location and season on the toxicity of urban and rural particulate matter. Inhalation Toxicology. 2013;25(13):747–757. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2013.846443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Mueller et al. (2018) Mueller W, Horwell CJ, Apsley A, Steinle S, McPherson S, Cherrie JW, Galea KS. The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part I: filtration efficiency tests. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2018;221(6):967–976. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.03.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Neupane (2016) Neupane BB. Stimulated emission depletion microscopy resolves nanoparticle assembly on a porous membrane surface. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology. 2016;17:17–22. [Google Scholar]

Rauniyaar, Aryal & Neupane (2019) Rauniyaar J, Aryal GM, Neupane BB. Morphological study on particulate matter of Kathmandu valley. Bibechana. 2019;16:41–46. doi: 10.3126/bibechana.v16i0.19190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Reche et al. (2012) Reche C, Moreno T, Amato F, Viana M, Van Drooge BL, Chuang H-C, Bérubé K, Jones T, Alastuey A, Querol X. A multidisciplinary approach to characterise exposure risk and toxicological effects of PM10 and PM2.5 samples in urban environments. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2012;78:327–335. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.11.043. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Rengasamy, Eimer & Shaffer (2010) Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple respiratory protection—evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20–1000 nm size particles. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2010;54:789–798. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq044. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Ricardo & Phelan (2008) Ricardo R, Phelan K. Counting and determining the viability of cultured cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2008;16:752. doi: 10.3791/752. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Shakya et al. (2017) Shakya KM, Noyes A, Kallin R, Peltier RE. Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 2017;27(3):352–357. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.42. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Sharma et al. (2014) Sharma SK, Mandal TK, Saxena M, Sharma A, Datta A, Saud T. Variation of OC, EC, WSIC and trace metals of PM10 in Delhi, India. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2014;113:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2014.02.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Singh et al. (2010) Singh MP, Singh VK, Patel DK, Tandon PK, Gaur JS, Behari JR, Yadav S. Face mask application as a tool to diminish the particulate matter mediated heavy metal exposure among citizens of Lucknow, India. Science of the Total Environment. 2010;408(23):5723–5728. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.041. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Stender et al. (2013) Stender AS, Marchuk K, Liu C, Sander S, Meyer MW, Smith EA, Neupane B, Wang G, Li J, Cheng J-X. Single cell optical imaging and spectroscopy. Chemical Reviews. 2013;113:2469–2527. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Van Der Sande, Teunis & Sabel (2008) Van Der Sande M, Teunis P, Sabel R. Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population. PLOS ONE. 2008;3(7):e2618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002618. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Wang et al. (2008) Wang H, Zhuang Y, Wang Y, Sun Y, Yuan H, Zhuang G, Hao Z. Long-term monitoring and source apportionment of PM2.5/PM10 in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2008;20(11):1323–1327. doi: 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62228-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

World Health Organization (2016) World Health Organization Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. 2016. https://www.who.int/airpollution/en/ https://www.who.int/airpollution/en/

What Do Exosomes and Viruses Like HIV & Corona Have In Common?

Dr. James Hildreth PhD MD, proposed that “the virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word.” [1]

Screen Shot 2020-05-03 at 9.57.43 AM

What Are Exosomes?

Exosomes are membrane bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic cells.[2][3][4] The multivesicular body (MVB) is an endosome defined by intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) that bud inward into the endosomal lumen. If the MVB fuses with the cell surface (the plasma membrane), these ILVs are released as exosomes. In multicellular organisms, exosomes and other EVs are present in tissues and can also be found in biological fluids including blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. They are also released in vitro by cultured cells into their growth medium.[5][6][7][8]

Since the size of exosomes is limited by that of the parent MVB, exosomes are generally thought to be smaller than most other EVs, from about 30 to 150 nanometres (nm) in diameter: around the same size as many lipoproteins but much smaller than cells.[5] Compared with EVs in general, it is unclear whether exosomes have unique characteristics or functions or can be separated or distinguished effectively from other EVs.[2] EVs including exosomes carry markers of cells of origin and have specialized functions in physiological processes, from coagulation and intercellular signaling to acidic waste management of the intravascular and interstitial fluids of the Interstitium – the largest organ of the human body.[5]

Are Exosomes Viruses?

There is NO scientific evidence from ANY research (published or otherwise) from ANY scientist or group of scientists any where in the World validating the existence of the so-called invisible virus or that exosomes have been proven to be the existence of any virus!

Exosomes are created endogenously by the cells, even the red blood cells as a means of mediating or buffering metabolic, environmental, dietary and/or respiratory acidic waste in order to maintain the delicate pH balance of the intravascular fluids, the interstitial fluids and the intracellular fluids of the body cells at 7.365.[9]

Are Exosomes the Agents to the Activation of the Immune System and a Defense Against Metabolic Acids?

What may appear as viral particles are many times indistinguishable from exosomes.

Exosomes are natural micro-vesicles produced by cells; they carry messages from cell to cell, and to other tissues, and possibly to other people. They are essential to health because they carry acidic waste out of damaged cells and trigger the lymphocytes to release reduced oxygen (SO-) and reduced hydrogen (OH-) molecules to buffer metabolic acidic cellular waste to prevent the death of the body.

Are COVID-19 and HIV Exosomes?

Based upon electron microscopy the so-called COVID-19 virus and the the so-called HIV virus are 100 nm in diameter and appear identical to exosomes.

Screen Shot 2020-05-14 at 8.34.42 AM

Screen Shot 2020-05-14 at 8.31.34 AM

Endogenously Created Exosomes Protect the Cells

In January 18th of 2020, three scientists published a scientific paper describing the protective purpose of exosomes, entitled, “Exosome-Mediated Transfer of ACE2 (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2) from Endothelial Progenitor Cells Promotes Survival and Function of Endothelial Cell.”[9]

Research on Exosomes and Their Support of the Lymphocytes (Immune System) in Reducing Cancer-causing Acidic Waste

Exosomes from red blood cells contain the transferrin receptor which is absent in mature erythrocytes. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes express MHC I, MHC II, and costimulatory molecules and have been proven to be able to induce and enhance antigen-specific T cell responses in vivo in reducing metabolic acidic waste.[10]

What Is the Relationship Between Exosomes and COVID-19

They both contain the ACE2, or angiotensin converting enzyme-2 receptor and visually, using an electron microscope measure the same size. The exosomes or should we say the COVID-19, ACE2 receptor chops up two forms of a protein called angiotensin to keep blood pressure stable by protecting cell membranes from cellular breakdown from metabolic, dietary, environmental and respiratory acidic waste.[9]

So What is Causing the Symptoms of COVID-19 and the Release of Exosomes into the Extracellular Matrix?

It is a four letter word – ACID! Where is the ACID coming from?

The major contributing factors that cause cellular breakdown and the release of exosomes into the extracellular matrix are as follows:

1. Electro-magnetic pulsating frequencies ranging from 1GHz to 600GHz.[11][12][13]

2. Carbon Dioxide and Monoxide Poisoning.[14][15][16][17][18][19]

3. Glyphosate Acid Poisoning from non-organic fruit and vegetables.[20][21]

4. Lactic Acid Poisoning from diet and metabolism.[20]21]

5. Uric, Nitric, Sulphuric and Phosphoric Acid Poisoning from eating the flesh and blood of animals.[20][21]

6. Genetically Modified Organisms in our food supply and vaccines.[20][21]

7. Aluminum Oxide Poisoning from vaccination and chem trails.[24]

8. Antibiotic Poisoning.[22][23][24]

9. Acidic Polluted Water, Alcohol, Coffee, Black tea, Soda drinks, Sport drinks.[20][21]

10. Sugar in all of its form or any word that ends in ‘ose’.[20][21]

How Can I Support the Alkaline Design of the Body and Reduce Metabolic, Dietary, Environmental and Respiratory Acidic Waste that is Making Me Sick and Tired?

First, read five books by Dr. Robert O. Young to start with –

1. Sick and Tired, Reclaim Your Inner Terrain[20]

2. The pH Miracle revised and updated[21]

3. Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) As a Non-Toxic Antimicrobial Agent for Virus, Bacteria and Yeast (Candids Albicans)[22]

4. Alkalizing Nutritional Therapy in the Prevention and Treatment of any Cancerous Condition,[23] and,

5. Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis.[24]

Second, follow the protocol as outlined in Chapter 5 and 11 in The pH Miracle Revised and Updated for at least 12 weeks.[21]

Third, If you need further clarification and support you can setup a consultation with Dr. Robert O. Young by clicking here: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/services-page

Fourth, you can attend a pH Miracle Retreat and immerse yourself in a paradise of alkalinity. To learn more go to: www.phmiracleretreat.com

References

[1] https://rupress.org/…/6/9…/33690/When-is-a-virus-an-exosome…

[2] Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. (2018). “Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines”. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 7 (1): 1535750. doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750. PMC 6322352. PMID 30637094.

[3] Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PR, Andreu Z, Zavec AB, Borràs FE, Buzas EI, Buzas K, et al. (2015). “Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions”. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 4: 27066. doi:10.3402/jev.v4.27066. PMC 4433489. PMID 25979354.

[4] van Niel G, D’Angelo G, Raposo G (April 2018). “Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles”. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 19 (4): 213–228. doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.125. PMID 29339798.

[5] van der Pol E, Böing AN, Harrison P, Sturk A, Nieuwland R (July 2012). “Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles”. Pharmacological Reviews. 64 (3): 676–705. doi:10.1124/pr.112.005983. PMID 22722893.

[6] Keller S, Sanderson MP, Stoeck A, Altevogt P (November 2006). “Exosomes: from biogenesis and secretion to biological function”. Immunology Letters. 107 (2): 102–8. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2006.09.005. PMID 17067686.

[7] Spaull R, McPherson B, Gialeli A, Clayton A, Uney J, Heep A, Cordero-Llana Ó (April 2019). “Exosomes populate the cerebrospinal fluid of preterm infants with post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus”. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 73: 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.01.004. PMID 30639393.

[8] Dhondt B, Van Deun J, Vermaerke S, de Marco A, Lumen N, De Wever O, Hendrix A (June 2018). “Urinary extracellular vesicle biomarkers in urological cancers: From discovery towards clinical implementation”. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 99: 236–256. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2018.04.009. PMID 29654900.

[9] Wang J, Chen S, Bihl J, “Exosome-Mediated Transfer of ACE2 (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2) from Endothelial Progenitor Cells Promotes Survival and Function.” Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2020 Jan 18;2020:4213541. doi: 10.1155/2020/4213541

[10] Mignot G, Roux S, Thery C, Ségura E, Zitvogel L (2006). “Prospects for exosomes in immunotherapy of cancer”. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 10 (2): 376–88. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00406.x. PMC 3933128. PMID 16796806.

[11] Rubik, B. Bioelectromagnetic Medicine. Administrative Radiology Journal XVI(8), August 1997, 38-46.

[12] Young, R.O., “The Effects of ElectroMagnetic Frequencies (EMF) on the Blood and Biological Terrain.” https://www.drrobertyoung.com/…/the-effects-electromagnet-f…

[13] Young, R.O., “Adverse Health Effects of 5G Mobile Networking Technology Under Real-Life Conditions.” April 19th, 2020. https://www.drrobertyoung.com/…/adverse-health-effects-of-5…

[14] NOAA. (2016). In a high carbon dioxide world, dangerous waters ahead. (accessed on August 6, 2019)

[15] NOAA. (2018). What is Ocean Acidification? (accessed on August 6, 2019)

[16] National Geographic. (2017). Ocean Acidification. (accessed on August 6, 2019)

[17] NOAA. (2010). Ocean Acidification, Today and in the Future. (accessed on August 6, 2019)

[18] Young, R.O., Young, S.R, “The pH Miracle Revised and Updated.” Hachett Publishing, 2010.

[19] Are the Interstitial Fluids Raining Acid on YOUR Lung Cells? (December 17th, 2019)

[20] Young, R.O., “Sick and Tired.” https://www.phmiracleproducts.com/…/books-audio-video/produ…

[21] Young, R.O., Young, S.R. “The pH Miracle Revised and Updated.” Grand Central Publishing, NY, NY, 2010. https://www.phmiracleproducts.com/…/the-ph-miracle-revised-…

[22] Young, R.O.,”Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) As a Non-Toxic Antimicrobial Agent for Virus, Bacteria and Yeast (Candids Albicans),” Hikari Omni Media, August 2nd, 2016. https://www.phmiracleproducts.com/…/chlorine-dioxide-clo2-b…

[23] Young, R.O., Migalko, G., “Alkalizing Nutritional Therapy in the Prevention and Treatment of any Cancerous Condition.” Hikari Omni Media, August 1st, 2016. https://www.phmiracleproducts.com/…/alkalizing-nutritional-…

[24] Young, R.O., “Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis,” Hikari Omni Media, August 2nd, 2016. https://www.phmiracleproducts.com/…/second-thoughts-about-v…

The Corona Virus is Just a Concept That Only Exists on Paper

In 1960 a veteran retro virologist urged his peers to “raise questions whether the known facts about viruses suffice to account for it.” The subject was cancer, the veteran was Peyton Rous, and the quote is from a paper in Cancer Research. Mindful of that example, in 198I, asked a similar question in a paper likewise published in Cancer Research: whether the known facts about two human retroviruses suffice to account for Leukemia and AIDS.

Clearly, following Rous’s example did not make me very popular with the multinational club of retro virologists. My article was officially ignored and not “dignified” with a response because the AIDS virus establishment was “too busy . . . saving lives” and testing for antibodies to HIV – just like they are doing today with the phantom corona virus or COVID-19.

I was often shunned like an AIDS patient by my former fellow microbiologists and virologists. My views were unwelcome for several reasons: after a frustrating, twenty-year-long search for a human cancer microbe, the retro virologists were craving for clinical relevance and hence happily adopted HIV – ‘the AIDS virus’ -as the cause of AIDS. The discovery of HIV was announced in the U.S. at a press conference and the virus-AIDS hypothesis became instant national dogma. On this basis, the retro virologists convinced their governments to spend billions of dollars to stop the predicted viral epidemic, already being labelled “the epidemic of the 20th century.” Does all this sound familiar with what is happening today with COVID – 19?

The Viral Theory Was The Immediate Darling of the Biotechnology Companies

Due to its very low complexity, it can be readily cloned for diagnostic test kits and vaccines. In turn, the virus was a hit with the press because it mobilized in their readers the instinctive fears of a contagious disease, and appealed to the public prejudice that all evil comes from without.”

Where is the Proof?

Perhaps the foremost thing that should be said about HIV or for that matter any virus is that they have never been proven to be the cause of AIDS, or any human illness. Not one scientific paper exists that demonstrates it. This is also the case with Ebola, Zika and now SARS COVID-2 and 19!

Screen Shot 2020-04-22 at 10.12.42 AM

Based on activity in contrived situations in test tubes, among other illogical things, its culpability was a pronouncement handed down by an authority figure at the National Institute of Health. It is the same authority (Dr. Robert Gallo, head of NIH cancer labs removed from his position for scientific fraud) behind the expenditure of around a trillion dollars in cancer research which has produced NOTHING but an epidemic that is virtually out of control. (One wonders what it will take before people finally get the idea and stop creating walks, rides, telethons and cake sales to contribute money to the bottomless pit of biased, misdirected, wasteful and cruel orthodox medical research in cancer, degenerative disease and virology.)

And, it is the same authority who has taken out two patents whose value depends upon HIV or COVID – 19 as being accepted as the cause or a co-factor. One patent is for the technique of testing for the virus, and the other for a method of laboratory cultivation. No one in a position to do anything about it questions this obvious conflict of interest. This is going on right now today with the testing of an antibody without ever identifying isolating, purifying and culturing the virus, COVID-19.

Kary Mullis, PhD, Nobel laureate in chemistry for his invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for testing genetic matter, stated, “I can’t find a single virologist who will give me references which show that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS …. If you ask a virologist for that information, you don’t get an answer, you get fury” [1]. Dr. Mullis has continued his outspoken criticisms of the AIDS establishment, “Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? We know everything in the world about HIV now. There are 10,000 people in the World now who specialize in HIV.”

This same fraudulent activity in virology has continued with the Ebola virus, the Hantavirus, the Hepatitis virus, the West Nile virus, the Zika virus, just to name a few, and now with the Corona virus – COVID -19, which is an acronym that stands for, “Certificate Of Vaccination Identification (C.O.V.I.D.) – Artificial Intelligence (1 represents the first letter in the alphabet = A and 9 represents the ninth letter in the alphabet = I).

Screen Shot 2020-04-18 at 3.00.04 PM

Most virologist have very little interest in the possibility that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS or that the Corona virus doesn’t cause hypoxia that leads to acute respiratory disease syndrome or ARDS, because if it doesn’t, their expertise is useless. [2] Their embarrassment, humiliation and scientific fraud would also be considerable!

Just look what happened to Dr. Luc Montagnier, a virologist, for his non-discovery of the HIV virus, for which he received a Nobel Prize in Medicine without ever isolating the HIV virus under the scientific method of Koch’s Postulates and Farr’s law (see below for more information on Koch Postulates and Farr’s law).

Dr. Montagnier just recently inaccurately claimed that the phantom coronavirus is man-made and contains genetic material (GMO) from HIV which doesn’t even exist! So how does a virologist take genetic matter from HIV or a Corona virus or any other virus for that matter which has never been isolated, purified and genetically and biochemically identified?

NOW Take A Deep Breath

Just take a moment and take a deep breath and consider what if what I’m telling you is 100 percent true and it is only the tip of the iceberg?

Please, Please, Please do your own research! – Stop being a Sheep

First, start by reading, “Inventing the AIDS Virus” by Peter Duesberg, a Retro Virologist at The University of California Berkley.

Second, read Nobel laureate Kary Mullis, PhD book, “The Polymerase Chain Reaction” (PCR). Dr. Mullis does not see the relevance for testing antibodies by PCR when the virus such as HIV or COVID – 19 have not been isolated, purified, genetically and biochemically tested and then viewed under electron microscopy. Once these steps have been completed, the isolated and purified virus needs to be tested again by following the scientific method for verification of any disease causing germ. The tests are called Koch’s postulates and Farr’s law.

The Virus and Koch’s Postulates

Koch’s postulates are a set of conditions long accepted as the requirements for establishing a fixed microorganism as the cause of a specific disease. The case for HIV as the AIDS virus or COVID – 19 causes acute lung disease syndrome (ARDS) as with the identification of any so-called causative infectious agent, should depend upon meeting these parameters, of which there are four. (Keep in mind that researchers disagree about what constitutes proof that any germ causes a disease.)

1. The germ must be found in all cases of the disease.

Tissues said to be affected by HIV or COVID -19 include primarily the white blood cells of the immune system, particularly the T-cells, the brain neurons in dementia, skin cells in lesions of Kaposi’s sarcoma, in the lungs as well as, theoretically, any cell in the body expressing the CD4 surface receptor said to be the key to HIV or COVID – 19 cell entry. But no trace of the virus can be found in either the Kaposi’s sarcoma or the neurons of the central nervous system or the lungs in Acute Respiratory Disease Syndrome or ARDS. HIV and COVID -19 have moved from involving only immune cells to other types of cells in order to explain certain AIDS-defining symptoms or COVID -19 defining symptoms which are not immune deficiencies anyway, including the cancers, dementia and wasting diseases, dry cough, fevers and hypoxia which have not been, or cannot be, explained in terms of a germ-theory virus model that involves destruction of the immune system.

And, if HIV or the COVID-19 viruses were actively infecting T-cells or other members of the body’s immune system, extracellular virions should easily be found circulating in the blood. But in most individuals suffering from AIDSyndrome or COVID – 19, no particles can be found anywhere in the body.

Another aspect of HIV is that now several HIV and COVID “reservoirs” have been suggested. One encyclopedia, which will go unnamed, says: “Researchers have also been able to show direct infection of bone-marrow cells-the precursors of circulating blood cells-and the proliferation of the virus within these cells. Thus bone marrow may represent an important reservoir of HIV or in COVID -19 the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium in an infected person and provide a potential mechanism for dissemination of the virus through the body.” This is misinformation, pure speculation, a conclusion based on laboratory pyrotechnics, or scientific fraud. It is also said that macrophages can support HIV and COVID-19 replication while harboring the virus from immune surveillance. Circulating macrophages are said to play an important role in the distribution of HIV and COVID-19 throughout the body, including the lung and brain. The question is, wouldn’t there be significant amounts of virus in a reservoir? The fact remains: it is nearly impossible to recover HIV or COVID – 19 from its “victims.” (See below under “Autoimmune Theory.”) One paper published in March 1993 reported two individuals with about 100,000 particles per milliliter of blood, among dozens of patients with little or no detectable extracellular particles [18].

The abundance of uninfected T-cells (about one in 500) in all patients is the definitive argument against the false claims for high cell-wall particle “loads,” or “burdens”. The absence of active, infectious virus automatically disqualifies HIV as a player in the AID Syndrome or COVID – 19 in acute lung disease syndrome (ARDS).

2. The germ must be isolated from the host and grown in pure culture.

Even for the most experienced virus hunters, a virus that is so extremely scarce is difficult to find. Only with rare luck and extreme persistence has HIV or COVID – 19 been extracted from an antibody-positive person. This amounts to finding the proverbial needle of HIV or COVID – 19 in a haystack of human DNA. This difficulty speaks to HIV’s or COVID – 19’s lack of potential in disease.

3. The purified germ must cause the disease again in another host.

There is no animal or human model for HIV and AIDS or COVID – 19 and ARDS, and where there is no animal or human model, you cannot establish Koch’s postulates. (It is more than disconcerting to think of the number of primates that have been injected to this day in an attempt to produce AIDS.) HIV jumps in and says that HIV or any virus including COVD – 19 should receive special dispensation from Koch’s postulates. A major stumbling block is the latency which is claimed, but whose modus is not explained by authorities. In 1989 the official latent period between HIV infection and the onset of AIDS was one year. This period of “incubation” has since been stretched to 10 to 12 years. For each year that passes without the predicted explosion in AIDS cases, approximately one year is added to this period. Even this is insufficient; with only 5 percent of do-called infected Americans developing AIDS each year, the average latent period would have to be revised to more than 20 years for 100 percent to become sick.

HIV should cause AIDS and COVID – 19 should cause ARDS within two weeks of infection at most, but it does not, and with the complete lack of a demonstrated process by which HIV or COVID – 19 diminishes immune function, belief in a decade or more of unexplained latency requires a level of “faith” beyond my capacity. Another major stumbling block is that even once the latent period of 14 days is apparently over, there is still precious little development of the HIV or COVID – 19 virus.

4. The germ must then be isolable from the newly infected host.

A huge problem for the viral theory! We are now backing to the problem of meeting requirement number 2.

The Antibody That Isn’t an Antibody

According to the germ theory, an antibody is a certain antidote to a pathogen or virus. According to HIV and COVID -19, however, the more antibodies you have to HIV or COVID – 19, the sicker you are said to be. Viruses, including HIV and COVID – 19 are two of thousands “disease causing agents” in the allopathic file cabinet in which antibodies to the causative agent mean you’re in trouble; and it defies just about every known law, rule, guideline, fact, and behavior in the germ theory book. This includes, as we have seen in Koch’s postulates, and, as we will see below, Farr’s Law.

Furthermore, vaccine research proceeds on the basis of producing antibodies from a phantom virus in the patient. Apparently, these “synthetic” antibodies delivered in a vaccine with GMO organisms mixed with toxic metals and chemicals such as aluminum oxide, will signal recovery, while one’s own natural ly created antibodies signals death.

The Autoimmune Theory

One explanation put forth for the deadliness of such a scarce pathogen is that it somehow induces a self-destructive immune response (the system attacks itself). Evidence for this is said to be low white cell counts in people with infections; however, there is nothing to support the hypothesis, i.e., no plausible process by which this occurs has been suggested.

I have never viewed under a pHase contrast microscope a white blood cell attack another white blood cell in my 40 years of research watching and video taping their activities. White blood cells are glorified janitors or garbage collectors going around the body fluids picking up cellular fragments and biological transformations, i.e., bacteria and yeast. But they never attack each other or a healthy blood or body cell.

Watch the following video of two neutrophils moving around through the blood plasma while cleaning the membranes of red blood cells and picking up small bacteria and Y-form yeast. In fact, you will see one of the neutrophils picking up a Y-form yeast, like Candida albicans and then spitting it back out into the blod plasma.

The Elastic Band Theory

For the sake of discussion, let us allow germ-theory interpretation of immune function and autoimmunity. With only one in 500 immune cells (white blood cells) said to be infected with COVID -19 positives, it would seem to require a virus of extraordinary cunning to get uninfected cells to attack each other and not infected ones, which would be self-defeating for the virus. Or in the latter event, such cunning could be matched only by the adroitness required to move quickly from one host cell to another just before destruction. Or, if macrophages are involved, the process should lead either to increasing titers of virions in the blood, lymph, etc., as infected cells are lysed, or to increasing concentrations in macrophages if they are ingesting T-cells. This supports the reservoir notion (if there were any viruses to be found in them). It is thus easier to expand the theory to an ELASTIC BAND THEORY to meet whatever the outcomes are of the virologist for any virus, including HIV and COVID – 19! How about fourteen day latency period. Maybe a 2 year or even with HIV a 20 year latency period. Really! This is called science!

(Please read for further light and knowledge on viruses at: “Dismantling the Viral Theory” at: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dismantling-the-viral-theory

COVID – 19 and Farr’s Law

Established in the early 1900s, Farr’s Law, which is fundamental to virology, states that viral disease develops exponentially, and dictates that illness will strike soon after infection. The rate-determining factor of the exponential growth of viruses is viral generation time, which is between 8 and 48 hours. Since laws are made to be broken or excepted, viruses with incubation periods longer than allowed by Farr’s Law are called “slow viruses.” And since COVID – 19 joins an exonerated class of viruses by not multiplying according to this law of virology, virologists stretch the time to accommodate it. The question arises, though, of how anyone can determine or demonstrate when a “natural” COVID -19 infection takes place, and thus determine latency, since no one is being tested daily or weekly, etc., and there is no animal model. Within the slow-virus concept, adopted as an exception to Farr’s Law, retro virologists can find refuge, hold on to their theory, hibernate in their labs, and hope the long winter of HIV latency is over before they expire.

According to expert retro virologist Dr. Peter Duesberg, “The slow virus concept has never been reconciled with the short generation time of viruses and the immune system. Once the virus lies totally dormant, an intact immune system will never allow any virus to be reactivated to multiply into numbers that would threaten the host. For a virus to be reactivated, the immune system first must be destroyed by something else-the real cause of a disease. A reactivated virus would just contribute an opportunistic infection. Thus, there are no slow viruses, only slow virologists.” [19] Also, says Duesberg, “Retroviruses are all very similar. I mean, there are differences, but as far as pathology is concerned, you don’t see a marker in one which is going to explain why it supposedly wakes up from sleep and becomes active” [20].

As of April 22nd, 2020, I have yet to see ANY published research papers identifying the existence of a single virus that has proven out to cause ANY specific disease(s) following the scientific method. It appears that virologists have given the virus a pass because they JUST CANNOT FIND ONE!

The use of PCR testing, is one of the main tests being used by virologists today to determine antibody loads for the corona virus. It is very important for you to know that the PCR testing does not identify the existence of ANY specific virus. So, what you get is a guess. This is NOT science!

The following is another important quote concerning viruses, specifically HIV and AIDS from Dr. Mullis, “we have not been able to discover any good reason why most of the people on earth believe that AIDS is …caused by..HIV. There is simply no scientific evidence demonstrating that this is true (or) why doctors prescribe a toxic drug called AZT…we cannot understand why humans would take that drug for any reason.”

The AZT drug was one of the first drugs given for the treatment of HIV even when the patient was asymptomatic. Sadly, this toxic acidic drug was the cause of the AIDS and the death of millions. Not some illusionary virus. AZT is no longer being used because of this fact.

Third, read Robert O Young, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner book, “A Second Thought About Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis.”

This book also covers additional information on other phantom viruses such as the Ebola virus, West Nile virus, and the Hepatitis virus, just to name a few.

The link to purchase this book is:

Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS – Booklet

Fourth, watch the following youtube video of Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD, on the , “Relation between Corona virus, Electromagnetic waves, 5G, Vaccines and even Spirituality” on the cause and symptoms of the phantom Corona virus.

Now Let’s look at the 5G viral map of Canada, USA, Mexico, Central America and Northern South America at: https://www.speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map and see where the deployment of 5G viral cell towers are located and the hot spots for so-called COVID – 19 infections and deaths.

Screen Shot 2020-04-22 at 10.20.15 AM

Please note that New York and New Jersey have the greatest number of 5G viral cell towers with 1.5K and the greatest number of sick and dead. The second greatest number of 5G viral cell towers with 430 are found in the Los Angeles, California area with the second highest number of sick and dead. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out the cause and effect relationship between radiation poisoning with the symptoms of dry cough, hypoxia, and fever when you understand and know that 5G pulsating V-frequency at 60GHz literally takes the oxygen out of the air and out of your body destroying the red blood cells and their ability to flow to the lungs and pick up oxygen and then flow back to deliver this life-needing oxygen to the body cells. All of the symptoms for 5G viral radiation poisoning are identical to high-altitude sickness. You cannot treat these symptoms like the season flu or Influenza or you will kill the patient.

Fifth, watch Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD (American Researcher) on Coronavirus on the HIV to the Corona virus fraud and her 22 year relationship with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases –

Sixth, Watch from the NYC ICU: DOES COVID-19 REALLY CAUSE ARDS or Acute Respiratory Disease Syndrome??!!

Seventh, watch ‘Corona Virus’ & 5G – What Is A Virus? Dr. Robert O. Young. Here is the link:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jqD5tbQO1WUT/?fbclid=IwAR1BUXHvCPRd7lXpCvu3_tKqbrMA12-FAKImabX1-Vlo0rUayvqRAu3DsDc

The following micrographs, using pHase contrast microscopy that I observe in healthy red blood cells that are oxygen-rich and the second micrograph is of unhealthy red blood cells that are oxygen-deprived indicated by the white target or missing red blood cell hemoglobin. You can also see the degeneration of the cell membranes with spiking or knobs indicating the ‘corona effect’, a symptom caused by an acidic lifestyle and radiation poisoning.

Micrograph of Healthy Oxygenated Red Blood Cells

Screen Shot 2020-04-23 at 1.17.32 PM

References

  1. Hodgkinson N (1992) Experts Mount Startling Challenge to AIDS Orthodoxy. Sunday Times, London.

  2. Carroll, John (1993) The Weird Way to Win a Nobel Prize. San Francisco Chronicle, E9.

  3. Mirvish SS, Williamson J, Badcook D, Chen SC (1993) Mutagenicity of Iso-butyl nitrite vapor in the Ames test and some relevant chemical properties, including the reaction of iso-butyl nitrite with phosphate. Environ Mol Mutagen 21(3): 247-252.

  4. Rappaport John (1988) AIDS Inc., Scandal of the Century. Human Energy Press, California, USA, p. 38.

  5. Ibid p. 40.

  6. Fungalbionics Convention (1994) The Fungal/Mycotoxin Etiology of Chronic and Degenerative Disease. Metro Toronto Convention Centre, USA.

  7. Konotey-Ahulu (1989) F.I.D. What is AIDS? Watford England: Tetteh-A’Domeno Co., UK, pp. 109.

  8. Rappaport op. cit. p. 73.

  9. Williams AO (1992) AIDS: An African Perspective. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, pp. 238.

  10. Duesberg PH Inventing the AIDS t7ras, pp. 293.

  11. Konotey-Ahulu op. cit., p. 56-57.

  12. WHO (1995) The Current Global Situation of the HIV/AIDS Pandemic. World Health Organization, Switzerland.

  13. Duesberg PH (1992) AIDS acquired by drug consumption and other non contagious risk factors. Pharmacol Ther 55(3): 201-277.

  14. Ibid p. 240.

  15. Rappaport, op. cit., p. 71-82.

  16. Biggar RJ, Melbye M, Kestens L, de Feyter M, Saxinger C, et al. (1985) Seroepidemiology of HTLV-III antibodies in a remote population of Eastern Zaire. Br Med J 290: 808-810.

  17. Duesberg PH (1987) Retroviruses as carcinogens and pathogens: Expectations and reality. Cancer Research 47: 1199-1220.

  18. Lemonick MD (1995) Return to the Hot Zone. Time International.

  19. Duesberg PH, AIDS acquired by drug consumption. pp. 237-238.

  20. Rappaport, op. cit., p. 130.

  21. Culbert, Michael L (1898) Committee on Government Operations AIDS Drugs: Where Are They? 73rd Report. AsIDS: Hope Hoax and Hoopla, The Bradford Foundation, Chula Vista, Cal, p. 10-11.

  22. Chiu D, Duesberg PH (1995) The toxicity of Azidothymidine (AZT) on human and animal cells in culture at concentrations used for antiviral therapy. Genetica 95: 103-109.

  23. Duesberg PH, AIDS acquired by drug consumption. pp. 201-277.

  24. Yarchoan R, Pluda JM, Perno CF, Mitsuya H, Broder S (1991) Anti-retroviral therapy of human immunodeficiency virus infection: Current strategies and challenges for the future. Blood 78(4): 859-884.

  25. McLeod GX, Hammer SM (1992) Zidovudine: Five years later. Ann Intern Med 117(6): 487-501.

  26. Duesberg PH (1995) Is HIV the cause of AIDS? Lancet 346(8986): 1371-1372.

  27. Coulter Harris L (1987) AIDS and Syphilis- The Hidden Link. Berkeley, California, USA, p. 37.

  28. Rappaport, op. cit., pp. 152-153.

  29. James, Walene (1995) Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth. (2nd edn), Bergin & Garvey (Eds.), Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT, p. 35-36.

  30. Sermos Gus G (1988) Doctors of Deceit and the AIDS Epidemic-An expose of the Centers for Disease Control by an insider. GGS Publishing, USA, p. 3.

  31. RO Young (1999) Sick and Tired. Woodland Publishing, USA.